Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 26, 2017·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Anaheim Ducks 3, Florida Panthers 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 55% of the time.

FLA winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA19012213334
FLA383925822

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:04FLARadim VrbataAssists: Connor Brickley, Vincent Trocheck · Snap, 0.27 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:23FLAOwen TippettAssists: Jamie McGinn, Mike Matheson · Tip-in, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P1 6:24ANAKalle KossilaAssists: Logan Shaw, Chris Wagner · Slap, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P1 17:24FLARadim VrbataPPAssists: Nick Bjugstad · Snap, 0.22 xG1–3
  5. P2 4:03FLAVincent TrocheckGWGAssists: Connor Brickley, Alexander Petrovic · Tip-in, 0.01 xG1–4
  6. P2 8:27FLAEvgenii DadonovAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Jonathan Huberdeau · Snap, 0.08 xG1–5
  7. P2 15:37FLAAleksander BarkovSHAssists: Derek MacKenzie · Slap, 0.27 xG1–6
  8. P3 2:18ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Antoine Vermette · Slap, 0.45 xG2–6
  9. P3 8:39FLARadim VrbataAssists: Vincent Trocheck, Keith Yandle · Slap, 0.42 xG2–7
  10. P3 10:46ANALogan ShawAssists: Chris Wagner, Derek Grant · Slap, 0.15 xG3–7
  11. P3 17:19FLAEvgenii DadonovAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Jonathan Huberdeau · Snap, 0.11 xG3–8
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 1:29FLAAlexander Petrovic: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 15:53ANAJosh Manson: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 18:41ANAJosh Manson: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 18:41FLAMicheal Haley: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 11:07FLAMicheal Haley: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 13:59FLAIan McCoshen: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 18:47ANAChris Wagner: Holding2 min
  8. P3 11:24ANACorey Perry: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Barkov won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAFLA
34Shots on goal22
3.0Expected goals2.7
58Shot attempts33
33Faceoffs won20
3Power plays3
11Penalty minutes11
21Hits12
3Blocked shots11
14Giveaways20
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestWagner – Shaw – Kossila3:52

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 1–0

  2. Grant – Wagner – Shaw4:03

    xG 0.20–0.04 (82%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  3. Grant – Ritchie – Kase5:34

    xG 0.32–0.18 (64%)attempts 4–4goals 0–2

  4. Ritchie – Kase – Kossila5:39

    xG 0.22–0.11 (67%)attempts 7–1goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolzer – Lindholm5:54

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Manson – Megna8:48

    xG 0.21–0.16 (57%)attempts 10–3goals 0–1

  3. Manson – Lindholm6:08

    xG 0.28–0.23 (55%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestVrbata – Brickley – Trocheck7:32

    xG 0.49–0.11 (81%)attempts 7–5goals 2–0

  2. Dadonov – Huberdeau – Barkov11:49

    xG 0.29–0.19 (60%)attempts 9–6goals 2–0

  3. McGinn – Bjugstad – Malgin8:45

    xG 0.27–0.28 (49%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

  4. MacKenzie – Haley – Tippett6:20

    xG 0.01–0.37 (3%)attempts 1–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestYandle – Ekblad15:12

    xG 0.87–0.66 (57%)attempts 12–15goals 2–0

  2. Pysyk – McCoshen15:22

    xG 0.47–0.51 (48%)attempts 6–11goals 1–0

  3. Petrovic – Matheson14:46

    xG 0.23–0.40 (36%)attempts 4–10goals 3–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.7 xGANA 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #626 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.76 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 55% of the time.

FLA winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).