Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 28, 2017·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Columbus Blue Jackets 1, St. Louis Blues 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 74% of the time.

STL winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ08017112137
STL115111216442

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:26STLVladimir SobotkaAssists: Colton Parayko, Paul Stastny · Backhand, 0.23 xG0–1
  2. P2 6:31STLScottie UpshallGWGAssists: Joel Edmundson, Dmitrij Jaskin · Deflected, 0.19 xG0–2
  3. P3 1:29STLJoel EdmundsonAssists: Kyle Brodziak, Scottie Upshall · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P3 6:21CBJMatt CalvertAssists: Oliver Bjorkstrand, Alexander Wennberg · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P3 13:23STLKyle BrodziakAssists: Dmitrij Jaskin, Scottie Upshall · Tip-in, 0.26 xG1–4
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 8:34CBJJosh Anderson: High sticking2 min
  2. P2 1:30STLVladimir Sobotka: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 16:56CBJArtemi Panarin: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 2:23STLVince Dunn: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 7:31CBJZac Dalpe: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
46% to win54% to win
← CBJ attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sundqvist won the faceoff against Dubinsky
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJSTL
37Shots on goal42
2.6Expected goals4.1
55Shot attempts68
35Faceoffs won27
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
27Hits16
15Blocked shots11
1Giveaways5
6Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Anderson – Panarin13:13

    xG 0.70–0.50 (59%)attempts 12–13goals 0–1

  2. Dubinsky – Jenner – Dubois3:03

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Dubinsky – Atkinson – Jenner8:58

    xG 0.28–0.60 (32%)attempts 11–10goals 0–1

  4. Calvert – Bjorkstrand – Wennberg9:36

    xG 0.76–1.18 (39%)attempts 16–15goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestMurray – Nutivaara12:44

    xG 0.70–0.21 (77%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  2. Jones – Werenski17:51

    xG 0.99–1.19 (45%)attempts 19–21goals 1–1

  3. Johnson – Savard14:38

    xG 0.45–1.45 (24%)attempts 12–21goals 0–3

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestUpshall – Brodziak – Jaskin9:43

    xG 0.98–0.39 (71%)attempts 12–7goals 3–0

  2. Paajarvi – Bennett – Sundqvist7:01

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0

  3. Schenn – Tarasenko – Schwartz13:21

    xG 0.42–0.50 (46%)attempts 12–15goals 0–0

  4. Steen – Stastny – Sobotka12:03

    xG 0.99–1.10 (47%)attempts 13–20goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdmundson – Parayko12:43

    xG 1.44–0.85 (63%)attempts 18–18goals 4–1

  2. Bortuzzo – Edmundson2:17

    xG 0.12–0.04 (75%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Gunnarsson – Pietrangelo14:20

    xG 0.83–0.79 (51%)attempts 15–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 4.1 xGCBJ 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #967 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.63 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 74% of the time.

STL winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).