Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 28, 2017·Pepsi Center, Denver

Chicago Blackhawks 3, Colorado Avalanche 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 61% of the time.

COL winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI08213121342
COL31321015628

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:24COLMikko RantanenAssists: Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:20COLNathan MacKinnonPPAssists: Alexander Kerfoot · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–2
  3. P1 19:56COLMikko RantanenPPUnassisted · Wrist, 0.43 xG0–3
  4. P2 2:56COLNathan MacKinnonGWGAssists: Gabriel Landeskog, Mikko Rantanen · Wrist, 0.24 xG0–4
  5. P2 6:44COLSven AndrighettoAssists: Rocco Grimaldi, Tyson Barrie · Slap, 0.03 xG0–5
  6. P2 7:53CHINick SchmaltzAssists: Michal Kempny, John Hayden · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–5
  7. P2 14:05CHIArtem AnisimovAssists: Alex DeBrincat, Michal Kempny · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–5
  8. P3 8:45COLRocco GrimaldiAssists: Erik Johnson, Sven Andrighetto · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–6
  9. P3 15:05CHIRyan HartmanAssists: Tommy Wingels, Lance Bouma · Wrist, 0.20 xG3–6
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 0:58COLTyson Barrie: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 6:52COLPatrik Nemeth: Holding2 min
  3. P1 11:50CHIMichal Kempny: Holding2 min
  4. P1 14:22CHIJan Rutta: Tripping2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:24CHIRyan Hartman: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  6. P2 3:10COLA.J. Greer: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 3:10CHIBrent Seabrook: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 8:29COLBlake Comeau: Holding2 min
  9. P2 19:27CHIJonathan Toews: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 9:30COLNail Yakupov: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 12:10COLAndrei Mironov: Clipping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHICOL
42Shots on goal28
3.7Expected goals2.9
83Shot attempts46
42Faceoffs won27
5Power plays5
12Penalty minutes12
11Hits18
9Blocked shots19
2Giveaways5
8Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Panik – Saad8:39

    xG 0.81–0.32 (72%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  2. Bouma – Wingels – DeBrincat4:01

    xG 0.25–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Kane – Hayden – Schmaltz8:50

    xG 0.61–0.37 (62%)attempts 12–13goals 1–1

  4. Sharp – Anisimov – Bouma2:13

    xG 0.06–0.07 (44%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Franson5:26

    xG 0.56–0.12 (82%)attempts 9–3goals 0–1

  2. Kempny – Rutta2:04

    xG 0.44–0.03 (94%)attempts 6–1goals 1–0

  3. Seabrook – Rutta2:27

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen7:54

    xG 0.74–0.79 (48%)attempts 12–12goals 2–0

  2. Comeau – Soderberg – Nieto7:20

    xG 0.22–0.28 (44%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1

  3. Duchene – Grimaldi – Andrighetto7:38

    xG 0.14–0.22 (40%)attempts 8–8goals 2–1

  4. Yakupov – Kerfoot – Greer4:45

    xG 0.07–0.47 (14%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBarrie – Mironov2:47

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

  2. Barberio – Mironov3:23

    xG 0.21–0.06 (78%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Nemeth – Lindholm2:23

    xG 0.46–0.37 (55%)attempts 3–6goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.9 xGCHI 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #496 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.61 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 61% of the time.

COL winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).