Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 2, 2017·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Montréal Canadiens 3, Minnesota Wild 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 62% of the time.

MIN winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL0718216331
MIN3141825627

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:46MINMatt CullenAssists: Mike Reilly, Daniel Winnik · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:56MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Mathew Dumba · Deflected, 0.09 xG0–2
  3. P1 15:51MINTyler EnnisAssists: Matt Cullen, Mathew Dumba · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P2 12:09MINRyan SuterGWGAssists: Mikko Koivu, Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–4
  5. P2 13:09MTLBrendan GallagherAssists: Charles Hudon · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–4
  6. P3 0:34MINJared SpurgeonPPAssists: Mikko Koivu, Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–5
  7. P3 9:14MTLAndrew ShawAssists: Phillip Danault, Max Pacioretty · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–5
  8. P3 14:47MTLBrendan GallagherAssists: Tomas Plekanec · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–5
  9. P3 18:05MINMarcus FolignoENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.62 xG3–6
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 12:25MTLPhillip Danault: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 18:25MTLMax Pacioretty: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 13:41MTLBrendan Gallagher: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 19:46MTLJeff Petry: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 5:42MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← MTL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Danault
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLMIN
31Shots on goal27
2.0Expected goals2.5
53Shot attempts48
39Faceoffs won24
1Power plays4
8Penalty minutes2
16Hits16
12Blocked shots11
5Giveaways2
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestPacioretty – Shaw – Danault12:19

    xG 0.78–0.45 (63%)attempts 13–11goals 1–3

  2. Byron – Lehkonen – Drouin5:07

    xG 0.18–0.05 (77%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Galchenyuk – Lehkonen – Drouin4:51

    xG 0.14–0.04 (76%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  4. Plekanec – Byron – Gallagher3:27

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetry – Alzner5:17

    xG 0.37–0.00 (100%)attempts 10–0goals 1–0

  2. Weber – Mete13:47

    xG 0.58–0.40 (59%)attempts 14–10goals 1–1

  3. Alzner – Benn10:22

    xG 0.37–0.24 (61%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Niederreiter – Kunin10:59

    xG 0.46–0.22 (68%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  2. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund12:43

    xG 0.48–0.37 (56%)attempts 14–10goals 1–0

  3. Cullen – Winnik – Ennis9:30

    xG 0.30–0.29 (51%)attempts 4–6goals 2–2

  4. Stewart – Foligno – Eriksson Ek10:34

    xG 0.16–0.55 (22%)attempts 3–18goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon18:05

    xG 0.64–0.50 (56%)attempts 18–15goals 1–1

  2. Brodin – Dumba19:24

    xG 0.45–0.42 (51%)attempts 14–16goals 2–1

  3. Reilly – Olofsson9:59

    xG 0.37–0.79 (32%)attempts 4–15goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.5 xGMTL 2.0 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #432 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.57 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 62% of the time.

MIN winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).