Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Nov 6, 2017·TD Garden, Boston

Minnesota Wild 3, Boston Bruins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 73% of the time.

BOS winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN11104212327
BOS29215110534

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:53MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Ryan Suter, Jared Spurgeon · Backhand, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:23BOSJake DeBruskAssists: Zdeno Chara, Jordan Szwarz · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:42BOSFrank VatranoAssists: Jordan Szwarz, Zdeno Chara · Slap, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:34BOSSean KuralyAssists: Danton Heinen, Tim Schaller · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–3
  5. P2 7:43BOSTorey KrugGWGAssists: David Pastrnak, Patrice Bergeron · Slap, 0.02 xG1–4
  6. P3 1:33MINMikael GranlundAssists: Mathew Dumba · Slap, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P3 15:56MINEric StaalSHAssists: Jason Zucker · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:03BOSTim SchallerENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.69 xG3–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 12:50MINLuke Kunin: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 12:50BOSMatt Beleskey: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 12:50MINMathew Dumba: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P1 19:59MINEric Staal: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 3:16BOSKevan Miller: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 6:32MINMatt Cullen: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 6:55BOSTorey Krug: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min
  8. P3 15:09MINNino Niederreiter: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINBOS
27Shots on goal34
2.2Expected goals3.5
43Shot attempts59
35Faceoffs won32
1Power plays4
13Penalty minutes7
37Hits24
12Blocked shots6
7Giveaways12
13Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Foligno – Granlund4:45

    xG 0.20–0.05 (79%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Cullen – Stewart – Eriksson Ek4:22

    xG 0.23–0.19 (54%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  3. Staal – Ennis – Niederreiter10:48

    xG 0.72–0.68 (51%)attempts 12–8goals 1–1

  4. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund5:55

    xG 0.15–0.14 (52%)attempts 7–5goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Suter – Spurgeon17:53

    xG 0.55–0.55 (50%)attempts 15–15goals 1–1

  2. Quincey – Reilly10:08

    xG 0.52–0.59 (47%)attempts 8–7goals 0–2

  3. Brodin – Dumba17:02

    xG 0.26–0.64 (29%)attempts 7–18goals 1–1

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestKuraly – Schaller – Heinen8:46

    xG 0.72–0.22 (77%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  2. Szwarz – Vatrano – DeBrusk9:52

    xG 0.27–0.18 (60%)attempts 8–2goals 2–0

  3. Bergeron – Pastrnak – Bjork12:03

    xG 0.46–0.44 (51%)attempts 12–7goals 1–1

  4. Beleskey – Nash – Czarnik7:27

    xG 0.30–0.39 (44%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – McAvoy17:17

    xG 1.08–0.37 (74%)attempts 19–8goals 2–0

  2. Miller – O'Gara11:27

    xG 0.32–0.28 (54%)attempts 12–3goals 0–1

  3. Chara – Carlo2:32

    xG 0.23–0.24 (50%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 3.5 xGMIN 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #327 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.10 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 38% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 73% of the time.

BOS winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).