Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 16, 2017·Rogers Place, Edmonton

St. Louis Blues 4, Edmonton Oilers 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 66% of the time.

EDM winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL11311927439
EDM11201206130

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:14STLVladimir SobotkaSHAssists: Alex Pietrangelo, Paul Stastny · Backhand, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:43EDMRyan StromePPAssists: Matt Benning, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Snap, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:20STLAlexander SteenPPGWGAssists: Brayden Schenn, Alex Pietrangelo · Slap, 0.60 xG2–1
  4. P3 5:44STLBrayden SchennAssists: Scottie Upshall · Snap, 0.12 xG3–1
  5. P3 7:28STLBrayden SchennAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Colton Parayko · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–1
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 2:34STLChris Thorburn: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:34EDMZack Kassian: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 5:18STLVince Dunn: Holding2 min
  4. P1 8:40EDMAdam Larsson: Illegal check to head2 min
  5. P1 8:40STLJoel Edmundson: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 8:40EDMDarnell Nurse: Roughing2 min
  7. P1 10:59EDMEric Gryba: Roughing2 min
  8. P1 10:59STLKyle Brodziak: Roughing2 min
  9. P1 10:59EDMIiro Pakarinen: Roughing2 min
  10. P1 14:35STLMagnus Paajarvi: Holding2 min · PPG
  11. P1 18:12STLVince Dunn: Slashing2 min
  12. P2 6:19EDMZack Kassian: Tripping2 min · PPG
  13. P3 12:48EDMMilan Lucic: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 12:48EDMMilan Lucic: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against Schenn
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLEDM
39Shots on goal30
3.6Expected goals2.6
55Shot attempts54
26Faceoffs won29
4Power plays3
15Penalty minutes27
24Hits32
13Blocked shots14
5Giveaways15
8Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSteen – Stastny – Sobotka11:25

    xG 0.51–0.14 (79%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  2. Paajarvi – Jaskin – Sundqvist7:42

    xG 0.24–0.03 (90%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Thorburn – Upshall – Brodziak5:53

    xG 0.28–0.17 (63%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Schenn – Tarasenko – Schwartz11:12

    xG 0.68–0.82 (46%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGunnarsson – Parayko18:39

    xG 0.81–0.68 (54%)attempts 14–19goals 1–0

  2. Bortuzzo – Dunn11:23

    xG 0.22–0.12 (64%)attempts 12–4goals 0–0

  3. Pietrangelo – Edmundson13:46

    xG 0.88–0.80 (52%)attempts 12–15goals 1–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestLetestu – Kassian – Pakarinen2:41

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Maroon – Draisaitl – McDavid13:49

    xG 0.96–0.86 (53%)attempts 17–10goals 0–1

  3. Cammalleri – Strome – Puljujarvi7:03

    xG 0.10–0.05 (66%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

  4. Lucic – Nugent-Hopkins – Caggiula4:42

    xG 0.16–0.12 (57%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestLarsson – Nurse15:00

    xG 1.10–0.58 (65%)attempts 21–11goals 0–0

  2. Russell – Benning3:33

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

  3. Russell – Gryba9:24

    xG 0.26–0.50 (34%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.6 xGSTL 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 35/100 · #826 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.18 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 42% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 66% of the time.

EDM winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).