Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 18, 2017·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Calgary Flames 5, Philadelphia Flyers 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 55% of the time.

PHI winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CGY1133120511531
PHI31211601100439

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:32PHIBrandon ManningAssists: Valtteri Filppula · Snap, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 7:13CGYJohnny GaudreauAssists: Micheal Ferland, Sean Monahan · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 13:22PHISean CouturierPPAssists: Jakub Voracek, Shayne Gostisbehere · Wrist, 0.36 xG1–2
  4. P1 16:08PHIIvan ProvorovAssists: Jori Lehtera, Scott Laughton · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–3
  5. P2 6:07CGYSean MonahanPPAssists: Kris Versteeg, Mark Giordano · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P2 9:51CGYSean MonahanPPAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, TJ Brodie · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–3
  7. P2 14:02PHINolan PatrickAssists: Jakub Voracek, Ivan Provorov · Backhand, 0.17 xG3–4
  8. P2 14:56CGYSean MonahanPPAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Kris Versteeg · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–4
  9. OT 1:18CGYMichael FrolikGWGAssists: Mikael Backlund, TJ Brodie · Snap, 0.12 xG5–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 12:47CGYKris Versteeg: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min · PPG
  2. P1 16:54CGYMatt Stajan: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 16:54PHITaylor Leier: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 17:02PHIJakub Voracek: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 3:53CGYTJ Brodie: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 5:13PHIDale Weise: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 8:30PHIBrandon Manning: Slashing2 min · PPG
  8. P2 11:16PHIShayne Gostisbehere: Bench2 min
  9. P2 14:21PHIShayne Gostisbehere: Elbowing2 min · PPG
  10. P3 17:59CGYMatt Stajan: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← CGY attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Patrick
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYPHI
31Shots on goal39
2.8Expected goals3.0
59Shot attempts62
36Faceoffs won26
5Power plays3
8Penalty minutes12
27Hits21
16Blocked shots17
11Giveaways11
7Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestFerland – Gaudreau – Monahan10:35

    xG 0.78–0.14 (85%)attempts 16–6goals 1–0

  2. Brouwer – Frolik – Backlund12:02

    xG 0.36–0.45 (45%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  3. Jagr – Jankowski – Bennett10:47

    xG 0.14–0.46 (23%)attempts 5–13goals 0–1

  4. Stajan – Versteeg – Lazar8:12

    xG 0.02–0.38 (6%)attempts 2–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGiordano – Hamilton14:25

    xG 0.75–0.50 (60%)attempts 18–15goals 1–2

  2. Hamonic – Brodie17:05

    xG 0.58–0.46 (56%)attempts 16–13goals 0–0

  3. Stone – Kulak14:04

    xG 0.12–0.46 (20%)attempts 5–21goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestFilppula – Raffl – Konecny12:19

    xG 0.48–0.23 (68%)attempts 17–7goals 1–0

  2. Lehtera – Laughton – Leier6:25

    xG 0.18–0.01 (95%)attempts 10–1goals 1–0

  3. Simmonds – Weise – Patrick9:22

    xG 0.37–0.27 (58%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  4. Giroux – Voracek – Couturier11:48

    xG 0.36–0.69 (34%)attempts 10–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestManning – Gostisbehere16:35

    xG 0.93–0.49 (66%)attempts 24–10goals 1–0

  2. Alt – Sanheim12:48

    xG 0.27–0.30 (48%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  3. Hagg – Provorov14:06

    xG 0.49–0.64 (43%)attempts 15–18goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.0 xGCGY 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHICGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #68 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.43 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 10% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 55% of the time.

PHI winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).