Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 22, 2017·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Minnesota Wild 5, Buffalo Sabres 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 51% of the time.

BUF winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN31321405532
BUF11421119434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:55BUFJack EichelAssists: Jason Pominville, Evander Kane · Wrist, 0.23 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:59MINTyler EnnisAssists: Marcus Foligno, Charlie Coyle · Backhand, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:28MINMikael GranlundUnassisted · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P1 14:28MINNino NiederreiterPPAssists: Mikko Koivu, Ryan Suter · Tip-in, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P2 2:01BUFJordan NolanAssists: Kyle Okposo, Jacob Josefson · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P2 7:57MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Eric Staal, Jason Zucker · Wrist, 0.16 xG4–2
  7. P2 15:56MINMikael GranlundPPGWGAssists: Mikko Koivu, Ryan Suter · Tip-in, 0.16 xG5–2
  8. P2 18:25BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Jake McCabe, Johan Larsson · Wrist, 0.03 xG5–3
  9. P3 13:55BUFJordan NolanAssists: Nathan Beaulieu · Wrist, 0.02 xG5–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 14:00BUFBenoit Pouliot: Charging2 min · PPG
  2. P2 2:23MINMike Reilly: Holding2 min
  3. P2 8:25MINMike Reilly: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 12:18BUFJosh Gorges: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 14:56BUFNathan Beaulieu: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 19:41MINJonas Brodin: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Coyle won the faceoff against Eichel
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINBUF
32Shots on goal34
2.1Expected goals1.9
44Shot attempts63
30Faceoffs won25
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
11Hits18
15Blocked shots7
7Giveaways15
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Zucker – Niederreiter11:58

    xG 0.52–0.19 (73%)attempts 8–11goals 1–1

  2. Ennis – Foligno – Coyle11:11

    xG 0.32–0.11 (74%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  3. Koivu – Winnik – Granlund12:30

    xG 0.44–0.23 (65%)attempts 14–10goals 1–0

  4. Cullen – Stewart – Mitchell6:11

    xG 0.02–0.53 (4%)attempts 2–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon19:00

    xG 0.80–0.35 (70%)attempts 19–16goals 1–1

  2. Brodin – Olofsson2:38

    xG 0.07–0.09 (41%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  3. Brodin – Dumba17:18

    xG 0.37–0.51 (42%)attempts 12–18goals 2–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOkposo – Josefson – Nolan9:07

    xG 0.20–0.08 (72%)attempts 9–3goals 2–1

  2. Larsson – Girgensons – Criscuolo2:20

    xG 0.13–0.05 (72%)attempts 6–1goals 0–1

  3. Pouliot – O'Reilly – Reinhart12:12

    xG 0.37–0.32 (54%)attempts 15–10goals 0–1

  4. Pominville – Kane – Eichel13:35

    xG 0.54–0.66 (45%)attempts 12–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcCabe – Antipin14:54

    xG 0.46–0.22 (67%)attempts 19–6goals 1–1

  2. Gorges – Beaulieu11:43

    xG 0.57–0.55 (51%)attempts 14–11goals 1–1

  3. Falk – Scandella13:02

    xG 0.29–0.31 (48%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 1.9 xGMIN 2.1 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #176 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.82 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 51% of the time.

BUF winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).