Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 22, 2017·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Montréal Canadiens 2, Nashville Predators 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 51% of the time.

NSH winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MTL1709112010229
NSH1908113031333

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:47MTLJordie BennAssists: Charles Hudon, Phillip Danault · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 19:58NSHFilip ForsbergPPAssists: Ryan Johansen, P.K. Subban · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P3 3:16NSHFilip ForsbergPPAssists: Craig Smith · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P3 19:04MTLJoe MorrowUnassisted · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. NSH Kevin Fiala stopped
  2. 2. MTL Paul Byron stopped
  3. 3. NSH Filip Forsberg stopped
  4. 4. MTL Jonathan Drouin stopped
  5. 5. NSH Kyle Turris scored
  6. 6. MTL Max Pacioretty stopped
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 1:03NSHRyan Johansen: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 1:58NSHNick Bonino: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 8:38MTLAndrew Shaw: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 18:29MTLJonathan Drouin: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 2:42NSHViktor Arvidsson: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  6. P2 18:20NSHCalle Jarnkrok: Holding2 min
  7. P3 1:32MTLAndrew Shaw: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 8:10MTLBrendan Gallagher: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P3 8:10MTLBrendan Gallagher: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 8:10NSHP.K. Subban: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 8:10NSHKyle Turris: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 8:10MTLKarl Alzner: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← MTL attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jarnkrok won the faceoff against Plekanec
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLNSH
29Shots on goal33
3.1Expected goals3.0
50Shot attempts59
26Faceoffs won38
4Power plays4
12Penalty minutes12
22Hits24
13Blocked shots12
7Giveaways17
11Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestPlekanec – Gallagher – Hudon9:59

    xG 1.08–0.29 (79%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  2. Byron – Shaw – Danault11:14

    xG 0.06–0.11 (34%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  3. Deslauriers – Froese – de la Rose3:44

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Pacioretty – Galchenyuk – Drouin8:38

    xG 0.28–0.56 (33%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetry – Alzner11:12

    xG 1.14–0.29 (80%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  2. Morrow – Jerabek2:08

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Petry – Morrow2:43

    xG 0.14–0.13 (53%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestTurris – Smith – Fiala12:27

    xG 0.42–0.21 (67%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  2. Bonino – Jarnkrok – Forsberg3:29

    xG 0.17–0.05 (76%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Salomaki – Aberg – Gaudreau6:17

    xG 0.21–0.14 (60%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  4. Johansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson5:12

    xG 0.15–0.10 (61%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestIrwin – Bitetto11:13

    xG 0.14–0.03 (81%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  2. Emelin – Subban16:38

    xG 0.53–0.69 (44%)attempts 15–12goals 0–1

  3. Josi – Ekholm13:20

    xG 0.54–1.06 (34%)attempts 9–14goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.0 xGMTL 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #417 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.92 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 36% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 51% of the time.

NSH winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).