Sun, Nov 26, 2017·TD Garden, Boston
Edmonton Oilers 4, Boston Bruins 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 63% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM | 010 | 217 | 29 | 436 |
| BOS | 16 | 15 | 014 | 225 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 14:03BOSDavid PastrnakPPAssists: Torey Krug, Tuukka Rask · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
- P2 9:50EDMPatrick MaroonAssists: Zack Kassian · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–1
- P2 14:20EDMAdam LarssonAssists: Michael Cammalleri, Connor McDavid · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–1
- P2 15:31BOSDavid KrejciAssists: Riley Nash, Torey Krug · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–2
- P3 2:07EDMRyan StromeGWGAssists: Leon Draisaitl · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–2
- P3 19:09EDMLeon DraisaitlENAssists: Connor McDavid, Milan Lucic · Wrist, 0.65 xG4–2
Penalties (4)
- P1 13:24EDMMichael Cammalleri: Hooking2 min · PPG
- P1 14:39BOSFrank Vatrano: Tripping2 min
- P2 3:04EDMRyan Strome: Tripping2 min
- P2 16:41BOSZdeno Chara: Roughing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against McDavid
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Edmonton Oilers
Forward lines
- bestCammalleri – Lucic – McDavid12:50
xG 0.70–0.45 (61%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0
- Maroon – Nugent-Hopkins – Slepyshev13:32
xG 0.70–0.46 (60%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0
- Strome – Draisaitl – Caggiula10:34
xG 0.33–0.23 (59%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0
- Letestu – Kassian – Pakarinen7:17
xG 0.18–0.49 (27%)attempts 3–7goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestKlefbom – Benning12:21
xG 1.02–0.56 (64%)attempts 13–7goals 1–0
- Russell – Auvitu13:55
xG 0.51–0.35 (60%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1
- Larsson – Nurse19:51
xG 0.46–0.80 (37%)attempts 15–19goals 1–0
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestKrejci – Nash – Vatrano2:39
xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0
- Bergeron – Pastrnak – Heinen12:53
xG 0.61–0.49 (56%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1
- Szwarz – Schaller – Acciari4:28
xG 0.35–0.24 (59%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1
- Krejci – Nash – DeBrusk4:21
xG 0.23–0.23 (50%)attempts 2–7goals 1–0
Defence pairs
- bestChara – Carlo2:31
xG 0.16–0.03 (85%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
- Krug – McAvoy4:51
xG 0.13–0.16 (45%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0
- Chara – McAvoy13:47
xG 0.61–0.65 (49%)attempts 12–11goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 63% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BOS − EDM), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).