Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 1, 2017·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Anaheim Ducks 2, Columbus Blue Jackets 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 74% of the time.

CBJ winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA1515017227
CBJ110111210431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:02CBJBrandon DubinskyAssists: Artemi Panarin, Josh Anderson · Snap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:04ANACam FowlerAssists: Derek Grant, Dennis Rasmussen · Slap, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:32ANAKevin RoyAssists: Adam Henrique · Backhand, 0.20 xG2–1
  4. P2 10:54CBJArtemi PanarinPPAssists: Pierre-Luc Dubois, Josh Anderson · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P3 15:06CBJJosh AndersonGWGAssists: Artemi Panarin, Pierre-Luc Dubois · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:31CBJNick FolignoENAssists: Brandon Dubinsky, Jack Johnson · Wrist, 0.60 xG2–4
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 1:59CBJScott Harrington: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 12:40ANACorey Perry: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 15:13ANAChris Wagner: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 19:26CBJAlexander Wennberg: High sticking double minor4 min
  5. P2 0:35ANAChris Wagner: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 5:45ANAHampus Lindholm: Interference2 min
  7. P2 9:49ANAKevin Bieksa: High sticking2 min · PPG
  8. P2 19:52ANAJohn Gibson: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 19:52CBJNick Foligno: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 19:52ANAJosh Manson: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 6:36ANAKevin Bieksa: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 8:06ANALogan Shaw: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  13. P3 17:29CBJCam Atkinson: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dubinsky won the faceoff against Henrique
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACBJ
27Shots on goal31
1.9Expected goals3.1
46Shot attempts53
30Faceoffs won33
4Power plays7
18Penalty minutes10
17Hits18
9Blocked shots13
1Giveaways8
7Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestPerry – Henrique – Ritchie10:06

    xG 0.57–0.15 (79%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  2. Vermette – Roy – Kase10:39

    xG 0.34–0.25 (58%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Grant – Blandisi – Rasmussen4:27

    xG 0.08–0.28 (22%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  4. Cogliano – Wagner – Shaw8:30

    xG 0.03–0.42 (8%)attempts 4–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestManson – Lindholm11:45

    xG 0.33–0.27 (55%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

  2. Bieksa – Fowler9:00

    xG 0.49–0.44 (53%)attempts 5–9goals 1–1

  3. Fowler – Montour3:01

    xG 0.01–0.00 (79%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestAnderson – Panarin – Dubois8:53

    xG 0.49–0.19 (73%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

  2. Dubinsky – Foligno – Jenner5:06

    xG 0.21–0.08 (73%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Dubinsky – Jenner – Motte2:41

    xG 0.13–0.01 (92%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  4. Dubinsky – Sedlak – Motte2:01

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHarrington – Nutivaara11:13

    xG 0.43–0.05 (89%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  2. Jones – Werenski12:49

    xG 0.47–0.14 (77%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  3. Johnson – Savard13:32

    xG 0.61–0.85 (42%)attempts 17–16goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.1 xGANA 1.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 59/100 · #531 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.76 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 32% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 74% of the time.

CBJ winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).