Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 5, 2017·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Nashville Predators 5, Dallas Stars 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 74% of the time.

DAL winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH11241307532
DAL010021214245

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:49NSHKevin FialaPPAssists: Kyle Turris, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P2 2:48NSHCody McLeodAssists: Alexei Emelin, Frederick Gaudreau · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–0
  3. P2 4:26NSHPontus AbergGWGAssists: Calle Jarnkrok · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–0
  4. P2 7:34NSHKyle TurrisPPAssists: Mattias Ekholm, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–0
  5. P2 15:06NSHCalle JarnkrokSHAssists: Austin Watson · Wrist, 0.30 xG5–0
  6. P3 1:27DALStephen JohnsAssists: Jamie Oleksiak, Jamie Benn · Slap, 0.02 xG5–1
  7. P3 19:18DALJamie OleksiakUnassisted · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 4:03NSHNick Bonino: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 15:17DALJamie Benn: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 2:30NSHAnthony Bitetto: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 2:30DALCurtis McKenzie: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 2:43DALJamie Oleksiak: Fighting5 min · PPG
  6. P2 2:43NSHAustin Watson: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 7:18DALAlexander Radulov: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 14:25NSHColton Sissons: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 7:00DALMattias Janmark: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  10. P3 7:40DALDan Hamhuis: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P3 7:40NSHRoman Josi: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
46% to win54% to win
← NSH attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jarnkrok won the faceoff against Seguin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHDAL
32Shots on goal45
2.6Expected goals4.1
44Shot attempts75
23Faceoffs won31
3Power plays2
16Penalty minutes18
27Hits30
18Blocked shots6
4Giveaways11
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. Bonino – Sissons – Arvidsson10:16

    xG 0.21–0.31 (41%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

  2. McLeod – Watson – Gaudreau10:15

    xG 0.54–0.71 (43%)attempts 7–13goals 0–0

  3. Jarnkrok – Aberg – Forsberg11:46

    xG 0.14–0.47 (22%)attempts 4–12goals 1–0

  4. Turris – Smith – Fiala11:11

    xG 0.60–1.00 (37%)attempts 9–16goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Weber – Bitetto14:52

    xG 0.46–0.66 (41%)attempts 7–14goals 0–1

  2. Josi – Ekholm13:27

    xG 0.15–0.91 (14%)attempts 6–18goals 0–1

  3. Emelin – Subban17:27

    xG 0.51–1.63 (24%)attempts 10–26goals 1–0

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestRadulov – Benn – Janmark2:57

    xG 0.33–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  2. Radulov – Benn – Seguin9:17

    xG 0.52–0.33 (61%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  3. Spezza – McKenzie – Ritchie2:36

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  4. Pitlick – Faksa – Elie10:54

    xG 0.87–0.72 (55%)attempts 16–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKlingberg – Lindell15:36

    xG 1.23–0.31 (80%)attempts 25–8goals 0–0

  2. Johns – Oleksiak13:02

    xG 0.73–0.49 (60%)attempts 15–7goals 2–0

  3. Hamhuis – Pateryn16:58

    xG 0.65–0.41 (61%)attempts 16–11goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 4.1 xGNSH 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 60/100 · #522 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.62 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 74% of the time.

DAL winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).