Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 9, 2017·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Vancouver Canucks 2, Calgary Flames 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 75% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN1121705224
CGY11608311435

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:02VANJake VirtanenAssists: Michael Del Zotto · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:28CGYTroy BrouwerAssists: Curtis Lazar · Slap, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P2 19:05VANBrock BoeserPPAssists: Markus Granlund, Daniel Sedin · Tip-in, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P3 11:34CGYMatthew TkachukAssists: Garnet Hathaway, Mikael Backlund · Backhand, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P3 18:50CGYSam BennettAssists: Mark Jankowski, Garnet Hathaway · Backhand, 0.09 xG2–4
  6. P3 19:36CGYMatthew TkachukENGWGAssists: Michael Frolik, Travis Hamonic · Backhand, 0.59 xG2–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 5:43VANAlexander Edler: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 10:39CGYMicheal Ferland: Interference2 min
  3. P1 14:49VANNic Dowd: Holding2 min
  4. P2 1:21VANLoui Eriksson: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 2:05CGYMike Smith: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P2 15:46CGYGarnet Hathaway: Holding2 min
  7. P2 18:27CGYMark Giordano: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  8. P2 19:54VANBrendan Gaunce: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Monahan won the faceoff against Gagner
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCGY
24Shots on goal35
2.0Expected goals3.4
42Shot attempts64
29Faceoffs won31
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
13Hits13
11Blocked shots8
16Giveaways17
10Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestChaput – Gaunce – Virtanen10:41

    xG 0.39–0.28 (58%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  2. Gagner – Baertschi – Boeser2:54

    xG 0.20–0.13 (62%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

  3. Sedin – Sedin – Eriksson10:22

    xG 0.18–0.12 (60%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  4. Vanek – Gagner – Boeser3:20

    xG 0.01–0.07 (13%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Edler – Tanev17:03

    xG 0.28–0.43 (40%)attempts 9–20goals 0–0

  2. Hutton – Stecher13:14

    xG 0.28–0.62 (31%)attempts 12–13goals 0–1

  3. Del Zotto – Pouliot11:07

    xG 0.24–1.05 (18%)attempts 5–14goals 1–2

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestFrolik – Backlund – Tkachuk11:17

    xG 1.02–0.16 (87%)attempts 20–7goals 0–0

  2. Jankowski – Hathaway – Bennett10:37

    xG 0.81–0.11 (88%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  3. Stajan – Brouwer – Lazar5:43

    xG 0.07–0.18 (27%)attempts 8–6goals 1–1

  4. Ferland – Gaudreau – Monahan11:09

    xG 0.14–0.30 (31%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGiordano – Hamilton19:21

    xG 0.95–0.41 (70%)attempts 24–11goals 0–0

  2. Hamonic – Brodie12:12

    xG 0.63–0.24 (73%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  3. Stone – Brodie2:38

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.4 xGVAN 2.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 70/100 · #406 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.91 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 75% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).