Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 15, 2017·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

San Jose Sharks 3, Vancouver Canucks 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 71% of the time.

VAN winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
SJS1131151801337
VAN2221100612440

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:44VANMarkus GranlundPPAssists: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin · Deflected, 0.17 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:45SJSBrent BurnsPPAssists: Logan Couture, Joe Pavelski · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P1 14:27VANMarkus GranlundAssists: Henrik Sedin, Daniel Sedin · Deflected, 0.20 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:56VANBrock BoeserPPAssists: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–3
  5. P2 18:16SJSMarcus SorensenAssists: Justin Braun, Jannik Hansen · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–3
  6. P3 14:11SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Joel Ward · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:34VANSam GagnerGWGAssists: Alexander Edler, Jacob Markstrom · Backhand, 0.17 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 0:15SJSBrenden Dillon: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 5:39VANAlex Biega: Interference2 min
  3. P1 10:28VANNic Dowd: Boarding2 min · PPG
  4. P1 12:20SJSJannik Hansen: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P1 18:34VANNikolay Goldobin: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 11:29SJSJustin Braun: Holding2 min · PPG
  7. P3 5:12VANAlexander Burmistrov: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gagner won the faceoff against Hertl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSVAN
37Shots on goal40
3.0Expected goals4.4
63Shot attempts55
29Faceoffs won21
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
12Hits21
5Blocked shots16
8Giveaways16
3Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestTierney – Labanc – Meier3:53

    xG 0.57–0.30 (65%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Ward – Hansen – Sorensen8:52

    xG 0.49–0.43 (53%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  3. Thornton – Pavelski – Donskoi2:28

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  4. Couture – Donskoi – Hertl5:07

    xG 0.41–0.50 (45%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Heed – DeMelo7:56

    xG 0.14–0.20 (42%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  2. Burns – Dillon16:29

    xG 0.61–1.13 (35%)attempts 20–14goals 1–0

  3. Vlasic – Braun19:00

    xG 0.82–1.42 (37%)attempts 17–20goals 1–1

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Vanek9:54

    xG 1.06–0.52 (67%)attempts 11–6goals 0–1

  2. Eriksson – Gagner – Boeser12:33

    xG 0.81–0.45 (65%)attempts 12–12goals 0–1

  3. Dowd – Granlund – Gaunce9:17

    xG 0.17–0.17 (50%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Burmistrov – Virtanen – Goldobin7:22

    xG 0.20–0.26 (43%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBiega – Del Zotto16:00

    xG 1.24–0.50 (71%)attempts 17–14goals 0–1

  2. Edler – Pouliot18:54

    xG 0.57–0.29 (66%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

  3. Hutton – Stecher11:44

    xG 0.29–0.68 (30%)attempts 7–15goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 4.4 xGSJS 3.0 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 79/100 · #287 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.89 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 71% of the time.

VAN winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).