Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 18, 2017·Rogers Place, Edmonton

San Jose Sharks 3, Edmonton Oilers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 64% of the time.

EDM winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS161718321
EDM28110211529

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:15SJSJoe PavelskiPPAssists: Kevin Labanc, Brent Burns · Slap, 0.60 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:42EDMMark LetestuAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Oscar Klefbom · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:51EDMRyan StromeAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Jujhar Khaira · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:36EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsAssists: Drake Caggiula, Patrick Maroon · Tip-in, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P2 8:32SJSTomas HertlAssists: Kevin Labanc, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P3 8:23EDMPatrick MaroonGWGAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Slap, 0.04 xG2–4
  7. P3 11:58SJSMarcus SorensenAssists: Justin Braun, Melker Karlsson · Backhand, 0.11 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:52EDMRyan StromeENAssists: Matt Benning · Wrist, 0.52 xG3–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 2:43SJSKevin Labanc: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 5:24EDMNathan Walker: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 12:40SJSTomas Hertl: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 12:37EDMKris Russell: Holding2 min
  5. P2 13:15SJSJoe Pavelski: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 13:46EDMRyan Strome: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hertl won the faceoff against Draisaitl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSEDM
21Shots on goal29
2.6Expected goals3.3
57Shot attempts52
36Faceoffs won32
3Power plays2
6Penalty minutes6
9Hits29
15Blocked shots20
9Giveaways19
6Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestDonskoi – Tierney – Meier13:42

    xG 0.65–0.37 (64%)attempts 17–11goals 0–1

  2. Sorensen – Hertl – Labanc3:05

    xG 0.13–0.04 (77%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Sorensen – Hertl – Karlsson3:48

    xG 0.26–0.25 (51%)attempts 4–5goals 1–1

  4. Ward – Sorensen – O'Regan2:24

    xG 0.00–0.08 (4%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurns – Vlasic2:18

    xG 0.35–0.11 (76%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  2. Heed – DeMelo10:57

    xG 0.09–0.19 (33%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  3. Burns – Dillon16:30

    xG 0.46–0.89 (34%)attempts 15–15goals 0–2

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestMaroon – Nugent-Hopkins – Caggiula10:43

    xG 0.86–0.16 (84%)attempts 14–3goals 2–1

  2. Lucic – McDavid – Puljujarvi13:14

    xG 1.03–0.58 (64%)attempts 11–14goals 0–0

  3. Strome – Khaira – Draisaitl10:05

    xG 0.40–0.09 (82%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  4. Letestu – Kassian – Walker5:57

    xG 0.11–0.34 (25%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDavidson – Larsson15:08

    xG 0.77–0.39 (66%)attempts 11–13goals 0–0

  2. Klefbom – Benning13:19

    xG 0.75–0.43 (64%)attempts 15–13goals 2–1

  3. Larsson – Nurse3:55

    xG 0.12–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.3 xGSJS 2.6 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 67/100 · #438 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.42 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 37% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 64% of the time.

EDM winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).