Thu, Dec 21, 2017·American Airlines Center, Dallas
Chicago Blackhawks 0, Dallas Stars 4
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 67% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 011 | 06 | 07 | 024 |
| DAL | 17 | 39 | 06 | 422 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 17:11DALJamie BennGWGAssists: Remi Elie, Dan Hamhuis · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
- P2 1:07DALAntoine RousselAssists: Dan Hamhuis, Greg Pateryn · Tip-in, 0.09 xG0–2
- P2 5:55DALTyler SeguinPPAssists: Jason Spezza, John Klingberg · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–3
- P2 16:14DALTyler SeguinAssists: Devin Shore · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–4
Penalties (6)
- P1 15:08CHITommy Wingels: Tripping2 min
- P1 16:42CHILance Bouma: Roughing2 min
- P1 16:42DALMartin Hanzal: Roughing2 min
- P2 5:06CHIRyan Hartman: Tripping2 min · PPG
- P3 0:30CHIPatrick Kane: High sticking2 min
- P3 15:11DALGreg Pateryn: Holding the stick2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Benn
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- bestBouma – Wingels – Hayden9:28
xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 12–1goals 0–0
- Toews – Saad – DeBrincat9:41
xG 0.45–0.44 (50%)attempts 18–9goals 0–0
- Panik – Hinostroza – Hartman10:04
xG 0.29–0.48 (38%)attempts 13–6goals 0–1
- Anisimov – Kane – Schmaltz15:11
xG 0.43–0.79 (35%)attempts 14–16goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestSeabrook – Kempny5:22
xG 0.26–0.00 (100%)attempts 13–1goals 0–0
- Oesterle – Kempny2:10
xG 0.29–0.15 (65%)attempts 2–6goals 0–1
- Keith – Oesterle16:10
xG 0.58–0.54 (52%)attempts 19–8goals 0–0
Dallas Stars
Forward lines
- bestRoussel – Pitlick – Faksa10:38
xG 0.81–0.32 (72%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0
- Seguin – Shore – Janmark11:44
xG 0.39–0.34 (54%)attempts 8–18goals 1–0
- Radulov – Benn – Elie10:40
xG 0.37–0.58 (39%)attempts 13–18goals 1–0
- Spezza – Hanzal – Smith7:45
xG 0.00–0.29 (0%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestKlingberg – Lindell17:17
xG 0.95–0.72 (57%)attempts 10–25goals 1–0
- Hamhuis – Pateryn19:45
xG 0.93–0.72 (56%)attempts 20–27goals 2–0
- Johns – Honka12:28
xG 0.31–0.42 (42%)attempts 7–14goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 67% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (DAL − CHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).