Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 22, 2017·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Minnesota Wild 2, Florida Panthers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

FLA winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN1911309231
FLA111010313434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:09MINRyan SuterPPAssists: Mathew Dumba, Mikael Granlund · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:53FLAVincent TrocheckAssists: Alexander Petrovic, Denis Malgin · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:34MINDaniel WinnikUnassisted · Backhand, 0.20 xG2–1
  4. P3 2:00FLAJonathan HuberdeauAssists: Aleksander Barkov · Backhand, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P3 11:14FLAConnor BrickleyGWGAssists: Keith Yandle · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:54FLAJonathan HuberdeauENAssists: Aleksander Barkov · Tip-in, 0.73 xG2–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 1:16MINMarcus Foligno: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 3:36MINCharlie Coyle: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 7:26FLAAaron Ekblad: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P1 12:02FLAMacKenzie Weegar: High sticking2 min
  5. P1 16:55FLAMicheal Haley: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 16:55MINChris Stewart: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 12:27FLANick Bjugstad: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 14:50MINChris Stewart: Too many men on the ice2 min
  9. P2 18:11FLAEvgenii Dadonov: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  10. P3 4:16FLAVincent Trocheck: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Trocheck
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINFLA
31Shots on goal34
2.4Expected goals2.5
52Shot attempts50
46Faceoffs won26
5Power plays3
11Penalty minutes15
9Hits23
12Blocked shots7
9Giveaways13
10Takeaways17

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestWinnik – Stewart – Eriksson Ek4:23

    xG 0.39–0.05 (88%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  2. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund10:56

    xG 0.44–0.23 (66%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

  3. Cullen – Ennis – Foligno3:37

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  4. Winnik – Coyle – Eriksson Ek2:10

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Prosser – Reilly7:47

    xG 0.23–0.20 (53%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

  2. Spurgeon – Brodin13:26

    xG 0.86–0.94 (48%)attempts 12–15goals 1–2

  3. Suter – Dumba14:59

    xG 0.19–0.34 (36%)attempts 13–14goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestBjugstad – Huberdeau – Barkov11:24

    xG 0.33–0.04 (89%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  2. MacKenzie – Sceviour – Haley4:22

    xG 0.09–0.00 (97%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Vrbata – Brickley – McCann4:48

    xG 0.16–0.40 (29%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

  4. Dadonov – Trocheck – Malgin11:58

    xG 0.14–0.63 (19%)attempts 10–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestYandle – Ekblad17:19

    xG 1.15–0.76 (60%)attempts 19–18goals 1–0

  2. Pysyk – Matheson11:21

    xG 0.16–0.16 (49%)attempts 8–10goals 1–0

  3. Petrovic – Weegar9:51

    xG 0.09–0.36 (19%)attempts 7–5goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.5 xGMIN 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLAMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 57/100 · #549 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.71 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

FLA winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).