Sat, Dec 23, 2017·BB&T Center, Sunrise
Ottawa Senators 0, Florida Panthers 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 59% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTT | 07 | 013 | 018 | 038 |
| FLA | 012 | 118 | 08 | 138 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 1:36FLAJonathan HuberdeauGWGAssists: Nick Bjugstad, Keith Yandle · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
Penalties (8)
- P2 3:32OTTErik Karlsson: Hooking2 min
- P2 8:31FLAJonathan Huberdeau: Interference2 min
- P2 12:21OTTChristopher DiDomenico: Slashing2 min
- P3 7:25FLAMike Matheson: Roughing2 min
- P3 7:25OTTJohnny Oduya: Boarding2 min
- P3 9:34OTTJean-Gabriel Pageau: Slashing2 min
- P3 18:49FLAAaron Ekblad: Cross checking2 min
- P3 19:04OTTJean-Gabriel Pageau: Interference2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Barkov won the faceoff against Brassard
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Ottawa Senators
Forward lines
- bestDiDomenico – Paul – Chlapik5:40
xG 0.18–0.08 (71%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0
- Brassard – Hoffman – Dzingel7:35
xG 0.45–0.34 (56%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0
- Burrows – Duchene – Dzingel5:44
xG 0.14–0.12 (54%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0
- Pyatt – Duchene – Stone3:06
xG 0.10–0.14 (42%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestKarlsson – Chabot6:57
xG 0.36–0.20 (65%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0
- Claesson – Ceci6:02
xG 0.53–0.42 (56%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0
- Karlsson – Claesson5:16
xG 0.29–0.19 (60%)attempts 12–4goals 0–0
Florida Panthers
Forward lines
- bestBjugstad – Huberdeau – Barkov12:10
xG 0.82–0.17 (83%)attempts 17–8goals 1–0
- Vrbata – Brickley – McCann8:31
xG 0.71–0.33 (68%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0
- Dadonov – Trocheck – Malgin9:55
xG 0.28–0.17 (62%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0
- MacKenzie – Sceviour – Haley7:57
xG 0.21–0.21 (50%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestPetrovic – Weegar12:31
xG 0.62–0.11 (85%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0
- Pysyk – Matheson15:49
xG 0.57–0.40 (59%)attempts 15–15goals 0–0
- Yandle – Ekblad16:42
xG 0.89–0.79 (53%)attempts 21–23goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 59% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (FLA − OTT), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).