Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 28, 2017·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Chicago Blackhawks 2, Vancouver Canucks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 56% of the time.

VAN winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI1140919232
VAN11317311531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:03VANSam GagnerAssists: Nikolay Goldobin, Thomas Vanek · Tip-in, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:22CHINick SchmaltzPPAssists: Patrick Kane, Duncan Keith · Slap, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:00VANThomas VanekAssists: Sam Gagner, Brock Boeser · Snap, 0.21 xG1–2
  4. P3 1:27VANSam GagnerGWGAssists: Thomas Vanek, Brock Boeser · Slap, 0.08 xG1–3
  5. P3 16:29VANThomas VanekAssists: Brock Boeser, Troy Stecher · Snap, 0.29 xG1–4
  6. P3 18:35VANBrock BoeserAssists: Thomas Vanek, Alexander Edler · Snap, 0.10 xG1–5
  7. P3 19:51CHIRyan HartmanAssists: Alex DeBrincat, John Hayden · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–5
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 5:00CHIGustav Forsling: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 7:58VANThomas Vanek: Interference2 min
  3. P1 11:02VANHenrik Sedin: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 15:54CHIBrandon Saad: Holding2 min
  5. P2 2:44CHITommy Wingels: Delaying game smothering puck2 min
  6. P2 7:52VANAlex Biega: Boarding2 min
  7. P2 7:52VANAlex Biega: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 7:52CHILance Bouma: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 10:20VANDaniel Sedin: Tripping2 min
  10. P2 15:16VANTroy Stecher: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Sedin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIVAN
32Shots on goal31
2.4Expected goals2.7
58Shot attempts45
35Faceoffs won27
5Power plays3
8Penalty minutes12
13Hits22
8Blocked shots15
8Giveaways8
7Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Saad – Hartman9:38

    xG 0.32–0.01 (98%)attempts 15–1goals 0–0

  2. Bouma – Wingels – Hayden3:31

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Kane – Schmaltz – Kampf4:31

    xG 0.05–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Sharp – Hayden – Kampf2:29

    xG 0.19–0.21 (47%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Oesterle14:55

    xG 0.32–0.21 (60%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  2. Seabrook – Murphy10:34

    xG 0.42–0.63 (40%)attempts 13–13goals 1–2

  3. Forsling – Rutta11:23

    xG 0.30–0.71 (30%)attempts 8–9goals 0–2

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestVanek – Gagner – Boeser11:32

    xG 1.07–0.42 (72%)attempts 10–14goals 4–0

  2. Dowd – Granlund – Gaunce3:20

    xG 0.16–0.01 (93%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Dowd – Gaunce – Virtanen3:55

    xG 0.04–0.04 (53%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Sedin – Sedin – Eriksson9:54

    xG 0.06–0.14 (29%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdler – Stecher13:37

    xG 0.73–0.34 (68%)attempts 12–15goals 2–0

  2. Del Zotto – Pouliot12:29

    xG 0.45–0.30 (60%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

  3. Gudbranson – Hutton10:36

    xG 0.22–0.44 (33%)attempts 4–11goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.7 xGCHI 2.4 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 44/100 · #710 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.19 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 56% of the time.

VAN winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).