Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 29, 2017·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Columbus Blue Jackets 4, Ottawa Senators 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 57% of the time.

OTT winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ0103718425
OTT0938211528

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 4:15CBJSonny MilanoAssists: Boone Jenner, Markus Nutivaara · Snap, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:42OTTDerick BrassardAssists: Erik Karlsson, Mark Stone · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:11CBJJosh AndersonAssists: Artemi Panarin · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P2 7:24CBJSonny MilanoAssists: Seth Jones · Snap, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P2 14:14OTTNick PaulAssists: Dion Phaneuf, Nate Thompson · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–2
  6. P2 18:52OTTMatt DucheneAssists: Johnny Oduya · Backhand, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. P3 7:41OTTMark StoneAssists: Dion Phaneuf · Wrist, 0.33 xG3–4
  8. P3 9:21OTTBobby RyanGWGAssists: Erik Karlsson · Snap, 0.12 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:28CBJZach WerenskiPPAssists: Josh Anderson, Pierre-Luc Dubois · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 0:34OTTJohnny Oduya: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 7:38CBJArtemi Panarin: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 11:09OTTJohnny Oduya: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 2:14OTTBobby Ryan: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P3 1:06OTTErik Karlsson: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 18:44OTTDion Phaneuf: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
46% to win54% to win
← CBJ attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dubois won the faceoff against Brassard
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJOTT
25Shots on goal28
1.8Expected goals2.0
48Shot attempts55
24Faceoffs won34
5Power plays1
2Penalty minutes10
21Hits29
19Blocked shots14
6Giveaways9
3Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestSchroeder – Motte – Hannikainen6:06

    xG 0.48–0.14 (77%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  2. Calvert – Sedlak – Motte4:40

    xG 0.23–0.01 (95%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Jenner – Bjorkstrand10:15

    xG 0.23–0.09 (71%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  4. Anderson – Panarin – Dubois12:55

    xG 0.19–0.09 (68%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Savard – Nutivaara13:19

    xG 0.37–0.36 (51%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

  2. Jones – Werenski17:11

    xG 0.62–0.63 (50%)attempts 17–16goals 1–2

  3. Johnson – Harrington14:04

    xG 0.29–0.64 (31%)attempts 6–19goals 1–2

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestBrassard – Hoffman – Stone5:55

    xG 0.62–0.05 (92%)attempts 5–2goals 2–1

  2. Ryan – Duchene – Dzingel10:51

    xG 0.51–0.29 (64%)attempts 19–9goals 2–0

  3. Burrows – Thompson – Paul3:07

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 1–0

  4. Pyatt – Brassard – Stone5:38

    xG 0.04–0.15 (19%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPhaneuf – Ceci7:04

    xG 0.51–0.11 (82%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  2. Phaneuf – Karlsson3:28

    xG 0.33–0.04 (89%)attempts 4–4goals 2–0

  3. Oduya – Karlsson10:39

    xG 0.37–0.22 (63%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 2.0 xGCBJ 1.8 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #143 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.02 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 13% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 57% of the time.

OTT winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).