Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 2, 2018·Centre Bell, Montreal

San Jose Sharks 4, Montréal Canadiens 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 60% of the time.

MTL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS11021518433
MTL01118012131

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:57SJSJoe ThorntonAssists: Justin Braun, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P2 11:27SJSMarc-Edouard VlasicGWGAssists: Mikkel Boedker, Kevin Labanc · Backhand, 0.26 xG2–0
  3. P2 16:07MTLAndrew ShawPPAssists: Max Pacioretty, Alex Galchenyuk · Wrist, 0.33 xG2–1
  4. P2 19:50SJSTimo MeierPPAssists: Kevin Labanc, Chris Tierney · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–1
  5. P3 1:13SJSTimo MeierAssists: Joe Pavelski, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–1
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 3:11SJSKevin Labanc: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 6:19SJSDylan DeMelo: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 14:22SJSJoel Ward: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 15:50MTLJoe Morrow: Tripping2 min
  5. P1 18:23MTLPaul Byron: Illegal check to head2 min
  6. P2 14:54SJSMikkel Boedker: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 15:49SJSBrent Burns: Delaying game2 min
  8. P2 18:05MTLJoe Morrow: High sticking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 19:44MTLNicolas Deslauriers: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Plekanec won the faceoff against Hertl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSMTL
33Shots on goal31
2.9Expected goals2.3
57Shot attempts57
28Faceoffs won28
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
13Hits21
15Blocked shots10
8Giveaways13
10Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestCouture – Donskoi – Hertl8:28

    xG 0.83–0.20 (81%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – Pavelski – Meier11:23

    xG 0.46–0.23 (67%)attempts 12–10goals 2–0

  3. Boedker – Tierney – Labanc11:12

    xG 0.47–0.51 (48%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

  4. Ward – Sorensen – Karlsson7:01

    xG 0.01–0.17 (6%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Braun14:05

    xG 0.71–0.44 (62%)attempts 15–11goals 2–0

  2. Burns – Dillon13:51

    xG 0.48–0.44 (52%)attempts 11–13goals 1–0

  3. DeMelo – Ryan10:48

    xG 0.25–0.34 (42%)attempts 9–13goals 0–0

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestPacioretty – Danault – Hudon10:07

    xG 0.46–0.05 (91%)attempts 16–2goals 0–1

  2. Deslauriers – Shaw – Carr7:14

    xG 0.27–0.36 (43%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

  3. Galchenyuk – Lehkonen – Drouin9:33

    xG 0.27–0.39 (41%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  4. Plekanec – Byron – Gallagher11:37

    xG 0.31–0.47 (40%)attempts 5–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestPetry – Benn12:09

    xG 0.70–0.44 (61%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0

  2. Alzner – Jerabek14:28

    xG 0.36–0.38 (49%)attempts 12–13goals 0–2

  3. Schlemko – Morrow10:24

    xG 0.20–0.43 (32%)attempts 6–10goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 2.3 xGSJS 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 34/100 · #836 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.15 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 60% of the time.

MTL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).