Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 4, 2018·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Buffalo Sabres 2, Minnesota Wild 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 61% of the time.

MIN winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF01001229231
MIN3839010627

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:09MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Mikael Granlund, Mikko Koivu · Snap, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 2:15MINDaniel WinnikAssists: Nate Prosser, Marcus Foligno · Snap, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P1 13:53MINNino NiederreiterPPGWGAssists: Charlie Coyle, Jared Spurgeon · Wrist, 0.22 xG0–3
  4. P2 4:02MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Mikael Granlund, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–4
  5. P2 13:07MINMikko KoivuAssists: Mikael Granlund, Jonas Brodin · Snap, 0.07 xG0–5
  6. P2 19:15MINCharlie CoyleAssists: Zach Parise, Joel Eriksson Ek · Snap, 0.30 xG0–6
  7. P3 1:54BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Zach Bogosian, Jake McCabe · Backhand, 0.06 xG1–6
  8. P3 18:59BUFEvander KaneAssists: Marco Scandella, Jason Pominville · Backhand, 0.21 xG2–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:16BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Interference5 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:16BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Game misconduct10 min
  3. P1 15:52BUFSam Reinhart: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 6:54MINMikael Granlund: Holding2 min
  5. P3 7:08MINGustav Olofsson: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 11:06MINJason Zucker: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  7. P3 13:34MINMarcus Foligno: Misconduct10 min
  8. P3 13:34BUFJordan Nolan: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Eichel
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFMIN
31Shots on goal27
2.2Expected goals2.7
48Shot attempts52
23Faceoffs won21
3Power plays3
27Penalty minutes16
20Hits9
13Blocked shots8
2Giveaways4
2Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Pouliot – Rodrigues5:17

    xG 0.39–0.09 (82%)attempts 10–3goals 0–1

  2. Pominville – Kane – Eichel3:26

    xG 0.28–0.17 (62%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  3. Josefson – Nolan – Larsson9:12

    xG 0.14–0.05 (72%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  4. O'Reilly – Girgensons – Reinhart3:09

    xG 0.10–0.07 (59%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Ristolainen4:58

    xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 0–0

  2. Scandella – McCabe3:21

    xG 0.21–0.03 (87%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Bogosian – Beaulieu8:22

    xG 0.28–0.12 (70%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Granlund – Niederreiter8:05

    xG 0.48–0.12 (80%)attempts 6–4goals 3–0

  2. Staal – Ennis – Zucker9:03

    xG 0.45–0.37 (54%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

  3. Cullen – Winnik – Foligno8:42

    xG 0.14–0.21 (40%)attempts 4–7goals 1–0

  4. Parise – Coyle – Eriksson Ek9:14

    xG 0.44–0.59 (42%)attempts 7–15goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestProsser – Olofsson14:24

    xG 0.54–0.43 (56%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  2. Suter – Spurgeon14:57

    xG 0.50–0.41 (55%)attempts 14–13goals 1–1

  3. Brodin – Dumba15:58

    xG 0.83–0.77 (52%)attempts 12–17goals 3–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.7 xGBUF 2.2 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 60/100 · #527 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.49 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 61% of the time.

MIN winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).