Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 8, 2018·Air Canada Centre, Toronto

Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Toronto Maple Leafs 2 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 52% of the time.

TOR winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
CBJ0110142414333
TOR0821401302237

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 11:09TORJames van RiemsdykAssists: Roman Polak, Tyler Bozak · Tip-in, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P2 16:02TORWilliam NylanderPPAssists: Jake Gardiner · Snap, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P3 15:25CBJNick FolignoAssists: Jordan Schroeder, Markus Nutivaara · Tip-in, 0.22 xG1–2
  4. P3 17:13CBJPierre-Luc DuboisAssists: Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. OT 3:11CBJArtemi PanarinGWGAssists: Zach Werenski, Seth Jones · Tip-in, 0.12 xG3–2
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 7:55TORRoman Polak: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 15:13TORNazem Kadri: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 4:57TORTravis Dermott: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 15:26CBJJosh Anderson: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 16:39CBJMatt Calvert: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
46% to win54% to win
← CBJ attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dubois won the faceoff against Kadri
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJTOR
33Shots on goal37
3.2Expected goals3.1
63Shot attempts62
28Faceoffs won29
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
27Hits15
15Blocked shots14
12Giveaways16
9Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestAnderson – Panarin – Dubois14:15

    xG 1.08–0.87 (56%)attempts 20–17goals 1–0

  2. Foligno – Calvert – Jenner2:29

    xG 0.10–0.00 (96%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Jenner – Bjorkstrand3:24

    xG 0.09–0.02 (82%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Sedlak – Milano4:48

    xG 0.20–0.16 (57%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSavard – Nutivaara12:47

    xG 0.62–0.31 (67%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

  2. Jones – Werenski19:02

    xG 1.10–1.00 (52%)attempts 27–18goals 1–0

  3. Johnson – Savard2:05

    xG 0.02–0.04 (27%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestMartin – Brown – Gauthier3:20

    xG 0.32–0.14 (70%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Bozak – Brown2:32

    xG 0.24–0.18 (57%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  3. van Riemsdyk – Bozak – Marner11:16

    xG 0.27–0.23 (54%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  4. Marleau – Komarov – Kadri12:49

    xG 0.65–0.62 (51%)attempts 14–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGardiner – Dermott14:02

    xG 0.79–0.61 (56%)attempts 15–14goals 0–1

  2. Gardiner – Borgman2:59

    xG 0.09–0.05 (64%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Polak – Borgman8:00

    xG 0.26–0.33 (44%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 3.1 xGCBJ 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #415 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.66 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 2% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 52% of the time.

TOR winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).