Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 12, 2018·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Vancouver Canucks 5, Columbus Blue Jackets 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 85% of the time.

CBJ winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN0841219529
CBJ11101216229

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:33CBJSeth JonesPPAssists: Nick Foligno, Artemi Panarin · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:19VANSven BaertschiPPAssists: Thomas Vanek, Sam Gagner · Snap, 0.20 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:38VANErik GudbransonAssists: Loui Eriksson, Henrik Sedin · Snap, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:31VANBrendan GauncePPGWGAssists: Thomas Vanek, Michael Del Zotto · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–1
  5. P2 17:15VANAlexander EdlerAssists: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.01 xG4–1
  6. P3 12:35CBJMatt CalvertAssists: Scott Harrington, Nick Foligno · Slap, 0.02 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:51VANJake VirtanenENAssists: Markus Granlund · Snap, 0.67 xG5–2
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 3:43VANHenrik Sedin: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 19:37CBJZach Werenski: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 12:34CBJLukas Sedlak: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 17:50VANJake Virtanen: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 3:39CBJNick Foligno: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wennberg won the faceoff against Sedin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCBJ
29Shots on goal29
4.1Expected goals1.9
61Shot attempts63
37Faceoffs won24
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
24Hits21
19Blocked shots18
6Giveaways4
7Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestVanek – Gagner – Boeser9:38

    xG 0.70–0.08 (90%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Sedin – Sedin – Eriksson6:13

    xG 0.25–0.17 (60%)attempts 11–3goals 1–0

  3. Baertschi – Gaunce – Goldobin2:20

    xG 0.02–0.05 (25%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  4. Sedin – Sedin – Granlund4:32

    xG 0.03–0.07 (28%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDel Zotto – Gudbranson14:21

    xG 0.91–0.57 (61%)attempts 16–17goals 1–0

  2. Tanev – Hutton16:19

    xG 0.53–0.35 (60%)attempts 12–15goals 0–0

  3. Edler – Stecher15:05

    xG 0.27–0.45 (38%)attempts 13–17goals 1–0

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Calvert – Sedlak8:22

    xG 0.41–0.17 (71%)attempts 11–5goals 1–1

  2. Jenner – Bjorkstrand – Wennberg11:42

    xG 0.36–0.13 (74%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

  3. Schroeder – Motte – Hannikainen4:54

    xG 0.09–0.46 (16%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

  4. Anderson – Panarin – Dubois15:04

    xG 0.41–0.90 (31%)attempts 21–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Savard4:42

    xG 0.28–0.02 (95%)attempts 12–2goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Harrington8:47

    xG 0.19–0.15 (57%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  3. Jones – Werenski16:52

    xG 0.59–0.64 (48%)attempts 18–16goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 1.9 xGVAN 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #604 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.11 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 24% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 85% of the time.

CBJ winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).