Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 23, 2018·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Buffalo Sabres 5, Edmonton Oilers 0

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 51% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF11541207534
EDM08013012033

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:56BUFSam ReinhartPPGWGAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Jack Eichel · Tip-in, 0.19 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:17BUFRyan O'ReillyAssists: Scott Wilson, Sam Reinhart · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–0
  3. P2 7:25BUFZemgus GirgensonsAssists: Kyle Okposo, Jack Eichel · Deflected, 0.13 xG3–0
  4. P2 11:39BUFJack EichelPPAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Kyle Okposo · Wrist, 0.02 xG4–0
  5. P2 17:25BUFRyan O'ReillyPPAssists: Sam Reinhart, Jack Eichel · Snap, 0.14 xG5–0
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 10:10BUFJake McCabe: Holding2 min
  2. P1 13:47EDMAdam Larsson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 4:16BUFJake McCabe: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 11:26EDMJujhar Khaira: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 16:40EDMZack Kassian: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 13:21EDMDrake Caggiula: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Draisaitl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFEDM
34Shots on goal33
2.3Expected goals2.2
48Shot attempts70
29Faceoffs won40
4Power plays2
4Penalty minutes8
23Hits43
20Blocked shots8
13Giveaways20
11Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Reilly – Wilson – Reinhart11:42

    xG 0.84–0.43 (66%)attempts 12–11goals 1–0

  2. Okposo – Girgensons – Eichel10:49

    xG 0.30–0.22 (58%)attempts 6–13goals 1–0

  3. Pouliot – Nolan – Rodrigues10:41

    xG 0.38–0.51 (42%)attempts 8–18goals 0–0

  4. Pominville – Kane – Larsson13:08

    xG 0.16–0.35 (32%)attempts 8–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcCabe – Antipin17:13

    xG 0.63–0.42 (60%)attempts 10–18goals 1–0

  2. Scandella – Ristolainen17:57

    xG 0.83–0.94 (47%)attempts 14–29goals 1–0

  3. Falk – Nelson12:27

    xG 0.20–0.32 (38%)attempts 9–14goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestStrome – Khaira – Slepyshev6:26

    xG 0.26–0.02 (92%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0

  2. Maroon – Slepyshev – McDavid6:27

    xG 0.23–0.07 (78%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  3. Maroon – McDavid – Caggiula6:53

    xG 0.22–0.24 (48%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  4. Strome – Khaira – Caggiula3:55

    xG 0.05–0.10 (32%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSekera – Russell12:15

    xG 0.55–0.26 (68%)attempts 20–6goals 0–0

  2. Larsson – Nurse16:07

    xG 0.43–0.47 (48%)attempts 15–16goals 0–1

  3. Klefbom – Benning16:52

    xG 0.67–1.00 (40%)attempts 24–15goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.2 xGBUF 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 7/100 · #1188 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.65 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 51% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).