Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 1, 2018·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Florida Panthers 4, Buffalo Sabres 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 62% of the time.

BUF winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA3160719432
BUF11111209232

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:02BUFRyan O'ReillyPPAssists: Sam Reinhart, Kyle Okposo · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:06FLAKeith YandlePPAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Vincent Trocheck · Slap, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P1 14:29FLAMike MathesonPPAssists: Nick Bjugstad · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P1 18:11FLADenis MalginGWGAssists: Keith Yandle, Jonathan Huberdeau · Backhand, 0.10 xG3–1
  5. P2 0:32BUFZemgus GirgensonsSHAssists: Johan Larsson · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P3 17:36FLAColton SceviourAssists: Jared McCann, Keith Yandle · Backhand, 0.08 xG4–2
Penalties (19)
  1. P1 5:30FLAJared McCann: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:22BUFJohan Larsson: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  3. P1 10:28BUFMarco Scandella: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P1 13:43BUFNick Baptiste: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:02BUFEvander Kane: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 2:42BUFVictor Antipin: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 8:53FLAMicheal Haley: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 11:27FLAAaron Ekblad: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 17:59BUFEvander Kane: Interference5 min
  10. P3 17:59BUFEvander Kane: Misconduct10 min
  11. P3 17:59FLANick Bjugstad: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 17:59BUFEvander Kane: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 19:25FLAAlexander Petrovic: Misconduct10 min
  14. P3 19:25BUFJake McCabe: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 19:25BUFJohan Larsson: Cross checking5 min
  16. P3 19:25FLAAlexander Petrovic: Fighting5 min
  17. P3 19:25BUFJohan Larsson: Match penatly 10 minutes10 min
  18. P3 19:57FLAMicheal Haley: Misconduct10 min
  19. P3 19:57FLAMicheal Haley: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← FLA attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eichel won the faceoff against Barkov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLABUF
32Shots on goal32
2.0Expected goals2.6
50Shot attempts67
35Faceoffs won27
7Power plays3
35Penalty minutes47
16Hits21
16Blocked shots5
3Giveaways2
3Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. Trocheck – Huberdeau – Malgin10:25

    xG 0.58–0.55 (52%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

  2. Dadonov – Bjugstad – Barkov11:07

    xG 0.28–0.26 (52%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  3. Brickley – McCann – Mamin6:55

    xG 0.06–0.19 (24%)attempts 4–12goals 0–0

  4. MacKenzie – Sceviour – Haley7:49

    xG 0.20–0.58 (26%)attempts 3–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Yandle – Ekblad13:07

    xG 0.30–0.32 (49%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  2. Petrovic – Weegar9:59

    xG 0.41–0.47 (47%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0

  3. Pysyk – Matheson14:10

    xG 0.45–0.86 (35%)attempts 10–23goals 1–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOkposo – Kane – Eichel12:31

    xG 0.82–0.32 (72%)attempts 15–9goals 0–1

  2. Josefson – Nolan – Baptiste7:19

    xG 0.15–0.07 (68%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  3. O'Reilly – Wilson – Reinhart10:16

    xG 0.34–0.29 (54%)attempts 11–8goals 0–1

  4. Pominville – Larsson – Girgensons5:57

    xG 0.27–0.43 (39%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGorges – Nelson10:31

    xG 0.44–0.18 (70%)attempts 12–7goals 0–1

  2. McCabe – Antipin11:39

    xG 0.50–0.40 (55%)attempts 14–10goals 0–0

  3. Scandella – Ristolainen14:16

    xG 0.44–0.45 (49%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.6 xGFLA 2.0 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 49/100 · #639 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.54 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 62% of the time.

BUF winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).