Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 2, 2018·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Vegas Golden Knights 2, Minnesota Wild 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 88% of the time.

MIN winsVGK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VGK0815111224
MIN21921116536

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:05MINEric StaalPPAssists: Mike Reilly, Mathew Dumba · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:03MINCharlie CoyleAssists: Jonas Brodin, Joel Eriksson Ek · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–2
  3. P2 1:11MINTyler EnnisGWGAssists: Jonas Brodin · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–3
  4. P2 6:19VGKErik HaulaPPAssists: Colin Miller, David Perron · Deflected, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P2 16:08MINJared SpurgeonPPAssists: Ryan Suter, Eric Staal · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–4
  6. P3 12:38VGKNate SchmidtPPAssists: David Perron, Erik Haula · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:31MINEric StaalENAssists: Mathew Dumba, Jonas Brodin · Wrist, 0.67 xG2–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 5:22VGKJason Garrison: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 8:19VGKShea Theodore: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 5:15MINNino Niederreiter: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 14:17VGKJames Neal: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 19:27VGKRyan Carpenter: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 19:27MINMathew Dumba: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 3:28VGKShea Theodore: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 5:34MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Elbowing2 min
  9. P3 12:01MINMike Reilly: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VGK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← VGK attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Karlsson won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VGKMIN
24Shots on goal36
1.2Expected goals3.5
49Shot attempts65
25Faceoffs won27
3Power plays4
13Penalty minutes11
18Hits13
15Blocked shots14
1Giveaways9
4Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vegas Golden Knights

Forward lines

  1. bestCarrier – Carpenter – Bellemare6:23

    xG 0.16–0.05 (78%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Eakin – Lindberg – Tuch6:12

    xG 0.12–0.21 (36%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Neal – Perron – Haula8:32

    xG 0.10–0.37 (21%)attempts 4–9goals 0–2

  4. Smith – Karlsson – Marchessault12:56

    xG 0.11–0.45 (19%)attempts 13–18goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMiller – Schmidt2:26

    xG 0.12–0.01 (89%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Garrison – Miller12:16

    xG 0.26–0.29 (47%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  3. Engelland – Theodore14:10

    xG 0.13–0.34 (27%)attempts 13–16goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestParise – Coyle – Eriksson Ek12:20

    xG 0.93–0.33 (74%)attempts 16–14goals 1–0

  2. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund10:54

    xG 0.45–0.15 (74%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0

  3. Cullen – Winnik – Foligno9:16

    xG 0.13–0.02 (85%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  4. Staal – Ennis – Niederreiter9:38

    xG 0.24–0.28 (46%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Dumba14:41

    xG 0.99–0.30 (77%)attempts 21–11goals 2–0

  2. Suter – Spurgeon17:55

    xG 0.59–0.17 (78%)attempts 18–15goals 0–0

  3. Prosser – Reilly8:27

    xG 0.15–0.19 (45%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.5 xGVGK 1.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINVGK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it VGK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #627 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.73 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
VGK 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 88% of the time.

MIN winsVGK wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − VGK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).