Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 5, 2018·Air Canada Centre, Toronto

Anaheim Ducks 4, Toronto Maple Leafs 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 52% of the time.

TOR winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA016314114444
TOR11539316740

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:32TORAuston MatthewsAssists: Zach Hyman, William Nylander · Wrap-around, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:43ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Rickard Rakell, Corey Perry · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:52TORWilliam NylanderAssists: Jake Gardiner · Snap, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:23ANARickard RakellAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Corey Perry · Backhand, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:06ANAOndrej KasePPAssists: Corey Perry, Jakob Silfverberg · Wrist, 0.32 xG3–2
  6. P2 15:28TORMitch MarnerPPAssists: Nazem Kadri, James van Riemsdyk · Snap, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. P2 17:40TORLeo KomarovAssists: Jake Gardiner, Nazem Kadri · Snap, 0.01 xG3–4
  8. P3 2:07ANARickard RakellAssists: Corey Perry, Josh Manson · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–4
  9. P3 3:28TORWilliam NylanderGWGAssists: Jake Gardiner · Snap, 0.13 xG4–5
  10. P3 16:49TORAuston MatthewsAssists: Kasperi Kapanen · Wrist, 0.18 xG4–6
  11. P3 19:06TORZach HymanENAssists: Connor Brown, Auston Matthews · Snap, 0.71 xG4–7
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 7:37TORNikita Zaitsev: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 11:40ANAKevin Bieksa: Interference2 min
  3. P1 17:47TORTravis Dermott: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 9:10TORLeo Komarov: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 14:12ANANick Ritchie: Slashing2 min · PPG
  6. P2 19:25ANACam Fowler: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kadri won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANATOR
44Shots on goal40
5.2Expected goals5.2
84Shot attempts64
33Faceoffs won38
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
26Hits10
12Blocked shots23
9Giveaways19
8Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Perry – Rakell14:42

    xG 2.40–0.71 (77%)attempts 27–10goals 3–0

  2. Vermette – Wagner – Brown6:15

    xG 0.48–0.24 (66%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

  3. Henrique – Ritchie – Kase9:22

    xG 0.56–0.74 (43%)attempts 18–11goals 0–1

  4. Kesler – Cogliano – Silfverberg10:28

    xG 0.15–0.68 (18%)attempts 8–11goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestManson – Lindholm15:03

    xG 2.38–0.72 (77%)attempts 37–12goals 3–1

  2. Bieksa – Fowler16:10

    xG 0.91–0.68 (57%)attempts 18–14goals 0–0

  3. Beauchemin – Manson2:25

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestHyman – Nylander – Matthews10:28

    xG 0.80–0.42 (65%)attempts 14–12goals 3–0

  2. van Riemsdyk – Bozak – Brown9:46

    xG 0.45–0.43 (51%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0

  3. Moore – Komarov – Kapanen6:52

    xG 0.29–0.52 (36%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  4. Marleau – Kadri – Marner11:28

    xG 0.71–1.91 (27%)attempts 10–16goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestRielly – Dermott4:18

    xG 0.42–0.03 (94%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Gardiner – Zaitsev10:55

    xG 0.80–0.51 (61%)attempts 16–13goals 4–2

  3. Hainsey – Zaitsev4:55

    xG 0.22–0.08 (73%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 5.2 xGANA 5.2 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #49 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.52 · 11 goals in reachComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 52% of the time.

TOR winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).