Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 8, 2018·United Center, Chicago

Dallas Stars 4, Chicago Blackhawks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 52% of the time.

CHI winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL0143917430
CHI112117010239

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:07CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P2 5:44DALTyler SeguinAssists: Alexander Radulov, Dan Hamhuis · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:43DALStephen JohnsAssists: Remi Elie, Radek Faksa · Slap, 0.01 xG2–1
  4. P2 12:48CHIArtem AnisimovPPAssists: Brent Seabrook, Vinnie Hinostroza · Wrist, 0.42 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:55DALTyler PitlickGWGAssists: John Klingberg · Slap, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:02DALTyler SeguinENAssists: Greg Pateryn · Wrist, 0.64 xG4–2
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 5:55DALJohn Klingberg: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 19:04CHITommy Wingels: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 7:17DALJamie Benn: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 11:40DALAlexander Radulov: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P3 10:31DALJamie Benn: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← DAL attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Faksa won the faceoff against Anisimov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALCHI
30Shots on goal39
2.7Expected goals2.6
52Shot attempts82
38Faceoffs won29
1Power plays4
8Penalty minutes2
34Hits25
32Blocked shots13
10Giveaways9
9Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestHanzal – Ritchie – Elie4:46

    xG 0.49–0.08 (86%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0

  2. Hanzal – Shore – Janmark3:50

    xG 0.32–0.01 (96%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Spezza – Shore – Janmark6:58

    xG 0.25–0.17 (60%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Radulov – Benn – Seguin13:18

    xG 0.42–0.43 (49%)attempts 11–19goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohns – Honka6:06

    xG 0.66–0.16 (80%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

  2. Hamhuis – Pateryn14:45

    xG 0.74–0.66 (53%)attempts 14–27goals 1–1

  3. Johns – Klingberg3:52

    xG 0.09–0.07 (56%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestAnisimov – Kane – Hartman11:34

    xG 0.35–0.11 (76%)attempts 16–10goals 0–0

  2. Toews – Duclair – DeBrincat10:43

    xG 0.36–0.26 (58%)attempts 16–7goals 1–1

  3. Sharp – Wingels – Kampf8:12

    xG 0.37–0.46 (45%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  4. Saad – Hinostroza – Schmaltz10:14

    xG 0.21–0.85 (19%)attempts 9–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeabrook – Gustafsson12:54

    xG 0.67–0.33 (67%)attempts 24–10goals 1–0

  2. Gustafsson – Oesterle2:38

    xG 0.11–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Keith – Oesterle2:16

    xG 0.05–0.10 (32%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.6 xGDAL 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 56/100 · #559 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.68 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 52% of the time.

CHI winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).