Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 12, 2018·Rogers Place, Edmonton

Florida Panthers 7, Edmonton Oilers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 62% of the time.

EDM winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA113214413740
EDM11121229532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:46FLAAaron EkbladPPAssists: Denis Malgin, Mike Matheson · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:35EDMPatrick MaroonAssists: Yohann Auvitu, Connor McDavid · Backhand, 0.29 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:46EDMLeon DraisaitlUnassisted · Snap, 0.35 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:21FLADenis MalginAssists: Mike Matheson, Mark Pysyk · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P2 9:35EDMDrake CaggiulaAssists: Kris Russell, Jujhar Khaira · Tip-in, 0.07 xG2–3
  6. P2 9:58FLAEvgenii DadonovAssists: Nick Bjugstad, Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–3
  7. P3 0:18FLAVincent TrocheckPPAssists: Keith Yandle, Aleksander Barkov · Backhand, 0.19 xG4–3
  8. P3 6:05FLAVincent TrocheckPPAssists: Keith Yandle, Jonathan Huberdeau · Snap, 0.05 xG5–3
  9. P3 6:53EDMAnton SlepyshevAssists: Mark Letestu · Snap, 0.08 xG5–4
  10. P3 10:46FLAEvgenii DadonovGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.35 xG6–4
  11. P3 14:58EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Patrick Maroon · Snap, 0.18 xG6–5
  12. P3 19:00FLAVincent TrocheckENAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau · Wrist, 0.67 xG7–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 16:20EDMBrandon Davidson: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 1:33EDMPatrick Maroon: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P2 2:46FLAAaron Ekblad: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min
  4. P2 19:38EDMKris Russell: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 5:53EDMJesse Puljujarvi: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 10:46EDMMatt Benning: Penalty shot slash on breakaway0 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← FLA attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Barkov won the faceoff against Draisaitl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAEDM
40Shots on goal32
4.0Expected goals3.2
68Shot attempts66
30Faceoffs won40
4Power plays0
0Penalty minutes8
25Hits36
19Blocked shots12
10Giveaways17
13Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestDadonov – Bjugstad – Barkov13:42

    xG 0.88–0.36 (71%)attempts 17–7goals 1–1

  2. Trocheck – Huberdeau – Malgin12:35

    xG 0.41–0.39 (51%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0

  3. McGinn – McCann – Mamin7:27

    xG 0.09–0.25 (25%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  4. MacKenzie – Sceviour – Haley5:05

    xG 0.06–0.22 (20%)attempts 5–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestYandle – Ekblad19:22

    xG 1.03–0.77 (57%)attempts 21–19goals 1–1

  2. Petrovic – Weegar13:19

    xG 0.50–0.56 (47%)attempts 11–17goals 0–0

  3. Pysyk – Matheson19:26

    xG 0.67–1.33 (34%)attempts 19–23goals 1–3

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestLetestu – Kassian – Slepyshev6:32

    xG 0.41–0.03 (93%)attempts 11–5goals 1–0

  2. Maroon – Strome – McDavid14:35

    xG 0.81–0.64 (56%)attempts 18–17goals 1–0

  3. Khaira – Puljujarvi – Caggiula7:38

    xG 0.29–0.31 (48%)attempts 5–5goals 1–1

  4. Cammalleri – Lucic – Draisaitl14:35

    xG 0.34–0.76 (31%)attempts 9–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDavidson – Nurse18:22

    xG 0.88–0.57 (61%)attempts 24–16goals 1–1

  2. Russell – Klefbom17:01

    xG 0.75–0.50 (60%)attempts 19–15goals 2–1

  3. Klefbom – Benning2:15

    xG 0.17–0.06 (75%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.2 xGFLA 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #60 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.43 · 12 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 62% of the time.

EDM winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).