Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 13, 2018·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

St. Louis Blues 3, Nashville Predators 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 54% of the time.

NSH winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
STL172160701331
NSH0130331512433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 15:18STLJay BouwmeesterAssists: Patrik Berglund, Brayden Schenn · Slap, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:10STLAlexander SteenAssists: Paul Stastny, Vladimir Tarasenko · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–0
  3. P2 9:00STLJaden SchwartzPPAssists: Alexander Steen, Vladimir Tarasenko · Wrist, 0.21 xG3–0
  4. P3 9:06NSHCalle JarnkrokAssists: Mattias Ekholm, P.K. Subban · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–1
  5. P3 14:33NSHAustin WatsonSHAssists: Ryan Ellis, Colton Sissons · Wrist, 0.34 xG3–2
  6. P3 15:48NSHAustin WatsonAssists: Craig Smith, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–3
  7. OT 1:19NSHFilip ForsbergGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.35 xG3–4
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 8:47STLVince Dunn: Holding2 min
  2. P1 16:52STLCarl Gunnarsson: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 7:47NSHRyan Johansen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 13:07STLAlex Pietrangelo: Holding2 min
  5. P2 14:57NSHKevin Fiala: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P3 13:37NSHCraig Smith: High sticking2 min
  7. OT 1:19STLJaden Schwartz: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stastny won the faceoff against Johansen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLNSH
31Shots on goal33
3.1Expected goals3.2
49Shot attempts71
29Faceoffs won38
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
22Hits18
25Blocked shots10
5Giveaways9
6Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestBerglund – Schenn – Schwartz12:06

    xG 0.48–0.14 (77%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  2. Sobotka – Jaskin – Barbashev4:24

    xG 0.07–0.06 (57%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Thorburn – Upshall – Brodziak4:34

    xG 0.04–0.03 (52%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Upshall – Brodziak – Sobotka3:05

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBortuzzo – Dunn4:36

    xG 0.39–0.05 (89%)attempts 7–4goals 1–0

  2. Gunnarsson – Pietrangelo16:10

    xG 0.47–0.32 (59%)attempts 11–20goals 0–0

  3. Bouwmeester – Parayko18:56

    xG 0.37–0.80 (32%)attempts 12–22goals 1–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestTurris – Smith – Fiala7:47

    xG 0.30–0.06 (82%)attempts 17–5goals 0–0

  2. Hartnell – Bonino – Jarnkrok10:50

    xG 0.30–0.21 (59%)attempts 14–7goals 1–1

  3. Hartnell – Bonino – Watson2:19

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Watson – Salomaki – Sissons5:49

    xG 0.03–0.17 (16%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJosi – Ellis16:14

    xG 1.09–0.31 (78%)attempts 25–15goals 1–1

  2. Emelin – Weber10:25

    xG 0.14–0.09 (60%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Subban – Ekholm16:14

    xG 0.51–0.64 (44%)attempts 24–8goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.2 xGSTL 3.1 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #174 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.73 · 7 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 1% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 54% of the time.

NSH winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).