Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 13, 2018·T-Mobile Arena, Paradise

Chicago Blackhawks 2, Vegas Golden Knights 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 54% of the time.

VGK winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI11018013231
VGK112013412537

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:10CHITommy WingelsPPAssists: Erik Gustafsson, Alex DeBrincat · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 5:06VGKRyan CarpenterAssists: Pierre-Edouard Bellemare, Deryk Engelland · Backhand, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:37CHIAlex DeBrincatAssists: Patrick Sharp, Ryan Hartman · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P3 1:14VGKBrad HuntPPAssists: David Perron, Colin Miller · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P3 3:07VGKReilly SmithGWGAssists: William Karlsson, Nate Schmidt · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–3
  6. P3 4:54VGKDavid PerronAssists: James Neal · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:44VGKTomas NosekENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.55 xG2–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 1:00VGKDeryk Engelland: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 12:06CHIErik Gustafsson: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 14:10CHIDuncan Keith: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 19:16CHIPatrick Kane: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 2:59VGKMarc-Andre Fleury: Penalty shot throwing object at puck0 min
  6. P2 10:35CHIBrent Seabrook: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 19:24CHITommy Wingels: Tripping2 min · PPG
  8. P3 2:26CHIPatrick Sharp: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 2:26VGKDavid Perron: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P3 11:46VGKOscar Lindberg: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 18:52CHIConnor Murphy: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VGK
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackVGK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Marchessault won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIVGK
31Shots on goal37
3.4Expected goals3.1
61Shot attempts67
28Faceoffs won29
2Power plays6
14Penalty minutes6
12Hits18
16Blocked shots18
5Giveaways15
5Takeaways20

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Wingels – Saad7:03

    xG 0.58–0.30 (66%)attempts 12–7goals 0–1

  2. Anisimov – Kane – Schmaltz7:47

    xG 0.37–0.15 (71%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  3. Bouma – Jurco – Kampf7:29

    xG 0.28–0.18 (61%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Sharp – Hartman – DeBrincat9:19

    xG 0.48–0.61 (44%)attempts 9–12goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeabrook – Kempny10:43

    xG 0.48–0.28 (63%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  2. Murphy – Gustafsson8:16

    xG 0.41–0.51 (44%)attempts 12–12goals 1–1

  3. Gustafsson – Dahlstrom2:16

    xG 0.00–0.19 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Vegas Golden Knights

Forward lines

  1. bestCarpenter – Bellemare – Nosek8:44

    xG 0.33–0.13 (71%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  2. Smith – Karlsson – Marchessault8:50

    xG 0.80–0.73 (52%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

  3. Eakin – Leipsic – Tuch4:55

    xG 0.09–0.19 (31%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1

  4. Neal – Perron – Lindberg6:48

    xG 0.26–0.44 (37%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMiller – Hunt11:33

    xG 0.64–0.23 (74%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  2. Engelland – Theodore13:58

    xG 0.52–0.57 (48%)attempts 14–15goals 1–0

  3. McNabb – Schmidt11:27

    xG 0.21–1.12 (16%)attempts 9–16goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VGK 3.1 xGCHI 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VGKCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VGK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VGK is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 58/100 · #542 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.59 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50VGK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 54% of the time.

VGK winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (VGK − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).