Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 15, 2018·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Washington Capitals 5, Minnesota Wild 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 53% of the time.

MIN winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH0629312527
MIN0808218234

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 0:59WSHTom WilsonAssists: Alex Ovechkin, Dmitry Orlov · Snap, 0.01 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:51WSHAlex OvechkinAssists: Andre Burakovsky · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P3 2:29WSHAndre BurakovskyGWGAssists: Brett Connolly, Philipp Grubauer · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–0
  4. P3 4:25MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Mikko Koivu, Gustav Olofsson · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P3 15:06WSHNicklas BackstromAssists: Alex Ovechkin, Tom Wilson · Wrist, 0.23 xG4–1
  6. P3 16:48MINEric StaalPPAssists: Mikael Granlund, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–2
  7. P3 17:46WSHTom WilsonENAssists: Nicklas Backstrom, Alex Ovechkin · Wrist, 0.64 xG5–2
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 9:23MINNino Niederreiter: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 10:14WSHDevante Smith-Pelly: Holding2 min
  3. P2 11:29MINEric Staal: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 7:15WSHTom Wilson: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 11:26WSHLars Eller: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P3 16:34WSHBrooks Orpik: Roughing2 min · PPG
  7. P3 19:19WSHTaylor Chorney: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← WSH attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Backstrom
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHMIN
27Shots on goal34
2.6Expected goals2.7
49Shot attempts55
29Faceoffs won39
2Power plays5
10Penalty minutes4
12Hits8
12Blocked shots11
3Giveaways4
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestOvechkin – Backstrom – Wilson11:46

    xG 0.61–0.45 (58%)attempts 12–9goals 1–0

  2. Eller – Connolly – Burakovsky8:51

    xG 0.15–0.14 (52%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  3. Beagle – Smith-Pelly – Stephenson9:10

    xG 0.04–0.14 (20%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Oshie – Kuznetsov – Vrana10:50

    xG 0.45–0.81 (36%)attempts 7–16goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrpik – Chorney12:19

    xG 0.46–0.24 (66%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  2. Niskanen – Orlov16:35

    xG 0.51–0.91 (36%)attempts 14–22goals 2–1

  3. Carlson – Djoos15:35

    xG 0.27–0.71 (28%)attempts 11–15goals 1–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Parise – Zucker4:45

    xG 0.56–0.18 (75%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund6:12

    xG 0.32–0.02 (93%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  3. Koivu – Granlund – Niederreiter3:57

    xG 0.55–0.36 (61%)attempts 10–3goals 1–1

  4. Staal – Ennis – Niederreiter6:01

    xG 0.08–0.05 (62%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon18:49

    xG 0.90–0.59 (60%)attempts 19–14goals 0–2

  2. Prosser – Seeler12:24

    xG 0.26–0.11 (70%)attempts 7–8goals 0–1

  3. Dumba – Olofsson16:17

    xG 0.42–0.68 (38%)attempts 14–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.7 xGWSH 2.6 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 51/100 · #625 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.80 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 53% of the time.

MIN winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).