Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 18, 2018·Pepsi Center, Denver

Edmonton Oilers 4, Colorado Avalanche 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 75% of the time.

COL winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM01718315440
COL1911106226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:04COLTyson JostUnassisted · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P2 11:57EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Patrick Maroon, Matt Benning · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–1
  3. P2 13:07COLAlexander KerfootAssists: Anton Lindholm, Colin Wilson · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P3 8:59EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Kris Russell · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P3 13:18EDMRyan StromeGWGAssists: Michael Cammalleri, Adam Larsson · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:34EDMConnor McDavidENAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Oscar Klefbom · Wrist, 0.72 xG4–2
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 5:03EDMDrake Caggiula: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 10:09COLColin Wilson: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P2 9:13EDMLeon Draisaitl: Slashing2 min
  4. P3 14:05EDMMatt Benning: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← EDM attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00McDavid won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMCOL
40Shots on goal26
3.6Expected goals2.1
61Shot attempts49
31Faceoffs won27
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes2
18Hits8
10Blocked shots8
3Giveaways5
2Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestMaroon – Draisaitl – McDavid5:27

    xG 0.45–0.03 (93%)attempts 10–2goals 1–0

  2. Strome – Khaira – Slepyshev6:00

    xG 0.34–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Cammalleri – Lucic – Strome2:05

    xG 0.24–0.02 (94%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  4. Letestu – Kassian – Puljujarvi5:45

    xG 0.31–0.21 (60%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestRussell – Klefbom13:14

    xG 0.86–0.29 (75%)attempts 15–8goals 0–0

  2. Klefbom – Benning2:38

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 1–0

  3. Russell – Davidson2:01

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLandeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen15:21

    xG 0.91–0.56 (62%)attempts 19–16goals 0–1

  2. Wilson – Kerfoot – Compher9:59

    xG 0.37–0.25 (60%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

  3. Bourque – Toninato – Jost5:25

    xG 0.04–0.08 (33%)attempts 1–2goals 1–0

  4. Comeau – Soderberg – Nieto11:22

    xG 0.33–0.82 (29%)attempts 7–12goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Zadorov8:58

    xG 0.82–0.39 (68%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1

  2. Barrie – Lindholm5:30

    xG 0.28–0.20 (59%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  3. Barrie – Nemeth2:19

    xG 0.10–0.06 (63%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.1 xGEDM 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 58/100 · #538 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.74 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 75% of the time.

COL winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).