Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Feb 19, 2018·Barclays Center, Brooklyn

Minnesota Wild 5, New York Islanders 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 64% of the time.

NYI winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN11131219532
NYI11226017335

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:02MINJoel Eriksson EkAssists: Charlie Coyle, Tyler Ennis · Tip-in, 0.18 xG1–0
  2. P1 19:15NYIRoss JohnstonAssists: Johnny Boychuk, Casey Cizikas · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:57NYIAnders LeeAssists: Thomas Hickey, Ryan Pulock · Tip-in, 0.03 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:54MINMatt CullenAssists: Ryan Suter, Mathew Dumba · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:17MINJason ZuckerAssists: Ryan Suter, Mathew Dumba · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P2 14:06MINTyler EnnisGWGAssists: Matt Cullen, Jared Spurgeon · Backhand, 0.11 xG4–2
  7. P2 16:31NYITanner FritzAssists: Anders Lee, Sebastian Aho · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–3
  8. P3 16:38MINJason ZuckerAssists: Eric Staal · Snap, 0.18 xG5–3
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 16:26MINMarcus Foligno: Slashing2 min
  2. P2 16:54NYIRyan Pulock: Interference2 min
  3. P3 0:25MINMikael Granlund: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 9:11MINZach Parise: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 18:37MINZach Parise: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYI
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackNYI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Tavares won the faceoff against Staal
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINNYI
32Shots on goal35
3.6Expected goals2.7
50Shot attempts75
29Faceoffs won34
1Power plays4
8Penalty minutes2
29Hits25
26Blocked shots13
19Giveaways15
7Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestEnnis – Coyle – Eriksson Ek9:08

    xG 1.02–0.59 (63%)attempts 8–21goals 1–1

  2. Staal – Parise – Niederreiter5:16

    xG 0.61–0.27 (69%)attempts 9–11goals 0–2

  3. Koivu – Parise – Granlund8:18

    xG 0.33–0.04 (88%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  4. Koivu – Zucker – Granlund6:02

    xG 0.40–0.12 (77%)attempts 3–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSpurgeon – Seeler16:48

    xG 1.36–0.53 (72%)attempts 14–23goals 2–2

  2. Suter – Dumba19:22

    xG 1.01–0.41 (71%)attempts 22–19goals 2–0

  3. Prosser – Olofsson9:35

    xG 0.69–0.31 (69%)attempts 4–11goals 1–0

New York Islanders

Forward lines

  1. Ladd – Nelson – Fritz11:25

    xG 0.18–0.41 (30%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

  2. Eberle – Barzal – Beauvillier10:22

    xG 0.40–0.75 (34%)attempts 12–6goals 0–2

  3. Clutterbuck – Cizikas – Johnston8:17

    xG 0.23–0.70 (25%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  4. Bailey – Tavares – Lee12:01

    xG 0.38–1.18 (24%)attempts 15–17goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Pelech – Aho14:55

    xG 0.52–0.49 (51%)attempts 17–7goals 1–0

  2. Hickey – Pulock14:08

    xG 0.49–0.68 (42%)attempts 20–11goals 1–2

  3. Boychuk – Leddy14:34

    xG 0.37–1.75 (17%)attempts 15–21goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYI 2.7 xGMIN 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYIMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYI is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #276 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.95 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50NYI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 64% of the time.

NYI winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (NYI − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).