Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 22, 2018·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

San Jose Sharks 1, Nashville Predators 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 71% of the time.

NSH winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS010111013134
NSH215112419746

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:55NSHNick BoninoAssists: Roman Josi, Ryan Ellis · Wrap-around, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:17NSHScott HartnellGWGAssists: Nick Bonino, Calle Jarnkrok · Tip-in, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P2 8:37SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Kevin Labanc, Justin Braun · Backhand, 0.01 xG1–2
  4. P2 15:57NSHKevin FialaAssists: P.K. Subban, Ryan Johansen · Wrist, 0.20 xG1–3
  5. P3 3:49NSHViktor ArvidssonPPAssists: P.K. Subban, Craig Smith · Snap, 0.60 xG1–4
  6. P3 6:30NSHRyan JohansenAssists: Roman Josi · Snap, 0.16 xG1–5
  7. P3 11:00NSHMattias EkholmAssists: Filip Forsberg, Viktor Arvidsson · Snap, 0.18 xG1–6
  8. P3 17:51NSHCalle JarnkrokUnassisted · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–7
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:38NSHFilip Forsberg: Holding2 min
  2. P1 16:42SJSBrenden Dillon: Boarding2 min
  3. P2 4:41NSHMiikka Salomaki: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 19:06NSHViktor Arvidsson: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 2:13SJSTimo Meier: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 8:53NSHFilip Forsberg: Interference2 min
  7. P3 14:46NSHViktor Arvidsson: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 15:21SJSBrent Burns: Penalty shot slash on breakaway0 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against Sissons
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSNSH
34Shots on goal46
3.4Expected goals4.7
69Shot attempts69
37Faceoffs won32
5Power plays2
4Penalty minutes10
10Hits20
12Blocked shots16
15Giveaways14
5Takeaways18

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestPavelski – Donskoi – Meier9:55

    xG 0.58–0.44 (57%)attempts 12–9goals 0–1

  2. Fehr – Goodrow – Karlsson10:06

    xG 0.21–0.44 (32%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  3. Hansen – Boedker – Tierney9:01

    xG 0.48–0.71 (40%)attempts 9–12goals 0–3

  4. Couture – Hertl – Labanc11:57

    xG 0.29–0.55 (34%)attempts 13–14goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Vlasic – Braun13:12

    xG 0.68–0.72 (49%)attempts 17–13goals 1–2

  2. Burns – Ryan13:41

    xG 0.37–0.49 (43%)attempts 13–16goals 0–0

  3. Dillon – DeMelo12:49

    xG 0.44–0.60 (43%)attempts 8–12goals 0–2

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestTurris – Smith – Fiala10:10

    xG 0.88–0.29 (75%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  2. Watson – Salomaki – Sissons9:21

    xG 0.37–0.13 (75%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  3. Hartnell – Bonino – Jarnkrok9:18

    xG 0.69–0.50 (58%)attempts 10–13goals 3–0

  4. Johansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson10:59

    xG 0.28–0.50 (36%)attempts 8–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSubban – Ekholm13:58

    xG 0.93–0.30 (76%)attempts 17–11goals 2–0

  2. Emelin – Weber13:29

    xG 0.46–0.51 (47%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  3. Josi – Ellis14:10

    xG 0.32–0.73 (30%)attempts 10–22goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 4.7 xGSJS 3.4 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 25/100 · #941 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.80 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 71% of the time.

NSH winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).