Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 25, 2018·Honda Center, Anaheim

Edmonton Oilers 6, Anaheim Ducks 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 58% of the time.

ANA winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
EDM21211726072642
ANA113111320021546

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:13EDMLeon DraisaitlAssists: Michael Cammalleri · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 1:46ANARickard RakellAssists: Cam Fowler, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:55EDMAnton SlepyshevAssists: Connor McDavid, Michael Cammalleri · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:22ANAAdam HenriquePPAssists: Brandon Montour, Ryan Getzlaf · Slap, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 8:02EDMRyan StromeAssists: Leon Draisaitl, Al Montoya · Backhand, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P3 2:31EDMRyan StromeAssists: Jesse Puljujarvi, Connor McDavid · Tip-in, 0.09 xG4–2
  7. P3 14:00ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Corey Perry, Hampus Lindholm · Tip-in, 0.07 xG4–3
  8. P3 15:40EDMIiro PakarinenAssists: Connor McDavid, Milan Lucic · Wrist, 0.15 xG5–3
  9. P3 19:39ANARickard RakellAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Corey Perry · Wrist, 0.17 xG5–4
  10. P3 19:53ANARickard RakellAssists: Corey Perry, Derek Grant · Tip-in, 0.25 xG5–5

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Rickard Rakell scored
  2. 2. EDM Michael Cammalleri stopped
  3. 3. ANA Ryan Getzlaf stopped
  4. 4. EDM Leon Draisaitl scored
  5. 5. ANA Ondrej Kase stopped
  6. 6. EDM Connor McDavid scored
Penalties (5)
  1. P2 0:10EDMAdam Larsson: Boarding2 min · PPG
  2. P2 12:53EDMDarnell Nurse: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 17:17ANAHampus Lindholm: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 4:10ANAAndrew Cogliano: Interference2 min
  5. P3 16:20EDMDrake Caggiula: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
46% to win54% to win
← EDM attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Draisaitl won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMANA
42Shots on goal46
3.8Expected goals4.2
67Shot attempts62
35Faceoffs won32
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
26Hits26
8Blocked shots12
12Giveaways14
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestLucic – Slepyshev – McDavid14:27

    xG 0.86–0.47 (65%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0

  2. Pakarinen – Khaira – Caggiula9:15

    xG 0.15–0.30 (34%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Kassian – Strome – Puljujarvi4:42

    xG 0.08–0.24 (24%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

  4. Cammalleri – Rattie – Draisaitl11:31

    xG 0.31–0.51 (38%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKlefbom – Benning14:06

    xG 0.75–0.36 (68%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  2. Larsson – Nurse16:49

    xG 0.65–0.86 (43%)attempts 14–20goals 3–0

  3. Sekera – Auvitu13:46

    xG 0.35–0.58 (38%)attempts 11–12goals 0–2

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Rakell – Kase4:05

    xG 0.31–0.03 (92%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Henrique – Ritchie – Kase6:00

    xG 0.30–0.18 (63%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  3. Perry – Henrique – Ritchie3:16

    xG 0.23–0.20 (53%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

  4. Grant – Wagner – Brown6:42

    xG 0.22–0.22 (51%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestManson – Pettersson11:22

    xG 0.72–0.29 (72%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

  2. Fowler – Montour16:55

    xG 0.87–0.66 (57%)attempts 19–11goals 1–2

  3. Bieksa – Lindholm10:29

    xG 0.35–0.55 (39%)attempts 5–11goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 4.2 xGEDM 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #17 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.74 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +53 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 58% of the time.

ANA winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).