Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 1, 2018·TD Garden, Boston

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Boston Bruins 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 76% of the time.

BOS winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT3708111426
BOS51431509838

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:35PITOlli MaattaAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Slap, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P1 1:45BOSDavid KrejciAssists: Rick Nash, Zdeno Chara · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P1 2:53BOSRiley NashAssists: David Pastrnak, Brad Marchand · Deflected, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P1 5:27BOSRick NashPPAssists: Torey Krug, Brad Marchand · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–3
  5. P1 9:27PITPhil KesselAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Evgeni Malkin · Snap, 0.09 xG2–3
  6. P1 12:49BOSDavid BackesAssists: Brian Gionta · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–4
  7. P1 16:07BOSTorey KrugGWGAssists: David Pastrnak, Riley Nash · Slap, 0.05 xG2–5
  8. P1 19:57PITRiley SheahanUnassisted · Slap, 0.05 xG3–5
  9. P2 2:16BOSDavid KrejciPPAssists: Nick Holden, Jake DeBrusk · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–6
  10. P2 14:33BOSDavid KrejciPPAssists: Brian Gionta, Charlie McAvoy · Wrist, 0.31 xG3–7
  11. P2 17:42BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Zdeno Chara, Charlie McAvoy · Tip-in, 0.07 xG3–8
  12. P3 5:15PITOlli MaattaAssists: Phil Kessel, Derick Brassard · Slap, 0.02 xG4–8
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 4:33PITEvgeni Malkin: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P1 7:07PITBrian Dumoulin: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 17:07BOSDavid Krejci: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 0:28PITBrian Dumoulin: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 3:00BOSTim Schaller: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 3:00PITEvgeni Malkin: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 5:38PITOlli Maatta: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 5:38BOSBrad Marchand: Embellishment2 min
  9. P2 8:00BOSDavid Pastrnak: Hooking2 min
  10. P2 10:50BOSZdeno Chara: Fighting5 min
  11. P2 10:50PITJamie Oleksiak: Fighting5 min · PPG
  12. P2 13:27PITMatt Hunwick: Holding2 min
  13. P2 19:16BOSTorey Krug: Interference2 min
  14. P3 7:25PITOlli Maatta: Slashing2 min
  15. P3 15:00BOSZdeno Chara: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nash won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITBOS
26Shots on goal38
2.5Expected goals4.2
40Shot attempts74
38Faceoffs won43
4Power plays5
19Penalty minutes17
28Hits30
25Blocked shots5
14Giveaways8
9Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. Brassard – Sheahan – Rust2:18

    xG 0.14–0.09 (60%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Malkin – Hornqvist – Kessel2:20

    xG 0.09–0.08 (53%)attempts 1–5goals 1–0

  3. Sheahan – Kuhnhackl – Rowney2:37

    xG 0.11–0.15 (42%)attempts 1–2goals 0–2

  4. Kuhnhackl – Rowney – Sheary2:11

    xG 0.02–0.08 (17%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOleksiak – Maatta2:27

    xG 0.14–0.09 (61%)attempts 3–4goals 1–1

  2. Hunwick – Schultz3:00

    xG 0.01–0.08 (16%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Schultz – Maatta10:45

    xG 0.23–0.32 (41%)attempts 4–14goals 2–1

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestNash – Krejci – DeBrusk7:28

    xG 0.40–0.02 (96%)attempts 6–2goals 1–0

  2. Kuraly – Schaller – Acciari8:07

    xG 0.46–0.13 (78%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  3. Marchand – Nash – Pastrnak7:30

    xG 0.59–0.29 (67%)attempts 12–4goals 2–2

  4. Gionta – Backes – Wingels8:18

    xG 0.57–0.32 (64%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMiller – Krug11:03

    xG 0.78–0.18 (81%)attempts 13–5goals 2–0

  2. Holden – Carlo8:26

    xG 0.63–0.15 (81%)attempts 11–3goals 1–1

  3. Chara – McAvoy9:30

    xG 0.57–0.34 (62%)attempts 16–6goals 2–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 4.2 xGPIT 2.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #273 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.17 · 10 goals in reachComeback index 39% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 76% of the time.

BOS winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).