Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 2, 2018·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Nashville Predators 4, Vancouver Canucks 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 55% of the time.

VAN winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
NSH01311521411443
VAN1111101600327

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:55VANBo HorvatPPAssists: Alexander Edler, Daniel Sedin · Tip-in, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P2 15:04VANBrandon SutterAssists: Brock Boeser, Darren Archibald · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 17:26NSHMike FisherAssists: Filip Forsberg, Viktor Arvidsson · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P3 10:02NSHKevin FialaAssists: Kyle Turris, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–2
  5. P3 11:54VANDaniel SedinPPAssists: Henrik Sedin, Alexander Edler · Wrist, 0.35 xG2–3
  6. P3 17:45NSHRyan EllisAssists: P.K. Subban, Calle Jarnkrok · Slap, 0.02 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:43NSHCalle JarnkrokGWGAssists: Viktor Arvidsson, Ryan Ellis · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 5:49NSHAlexei Emelin: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 9:11NSHRyan Hartman: Holding2 min
  3. P1 11:29VANMichael Del Zotto: Boarding2 min
  4. P2 18:44NSHMiikka Salomaki: Interference2 min
  5. P3 1:08VANAlexander Edler: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 9:28NSHRyan Johansen: Spearing5 min · PPG
  7. P3 9:28VANBrandon Sutter: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 9:28NSHRyan Johansen: Game misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← NSH attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansen won the faceoff against Sutter
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHVAN
43Shots on goal27
2.8Expected goals3.0
75Shot attempts51
37Faceoffs won30
2Power plays5
21Penalty minutes6
25Hits32
13Blocked shots18
2Giveaways8
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestBonino – Jarnkrok – Salomaki6:13

    xG 0.46–0.12 (79%)attempts 9–3goals 0–1

  2. Fisher – Watson – Sissons6:22

    xG 0.29–0.13 (69%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Johansen – Forsberg – Arvidsson10:21

    xG 0.40–0.35 (54%)attempts 16–8goals 0–0

  4. Bonino – Forsberg – Arvidsson2:26

    xG 0.05–0.01 (81%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestIrwin – Bitetto7:58

    xG 0.58–0.33 (64%)attempts 12–10goals 1–0

  2. Ellis – Ekholm16:58

    xG 0.40–0.26 (61%)attempts 25–6goals 0–0

  3. Emelin – Subban13:30

    xG 0.77–0.96 (45%)attempts 17–16goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Goldobin6:09

    xG 0.52–0.05 (91%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Gagner – Baertschi – Virtanen3:59

    xG 0.32–0.25 (56%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

  3. Gagner – Leipsic – Virtanen2:06

    xG 0.08–0.04 (68%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Sutter – Archibald – Motte8:54

    xG 0.34–0.36 (49%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPouliot – Hutton12:03

    xG 0.67–0.36 (65%)attempts 14–11goals 0–1

  2. Del Zotto – Stecher17:39

    xG 0.53–0.66 (44%)attempts 14–26goals 1–0

  3. Edler – Gudbranson14:45

    xG 0.41–1.10 (27%)attempts 8–26goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.0 xGNSH 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #120 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.34 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 6% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 55% of the time.

VAN winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).