Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 3, 2018·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Chicago Blackhawks 5, Los Angeles Kings 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 71% of the time.

LAK winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI1708410525
LAK01131407332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:11CHIJordan OesterleUnassisted · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P2 4:27LAKTanner PearsonUnassisted · Slap, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:21LAKAlec MartinezAssists: Dustin Brown, Anze Kopitar · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 17:48LAKAlex IafalloUnassisted · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–3
  5. P3 10:48CHIArtem AnisimovPPAssists: Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–3
  6. P3 14:24CHIVinnie HinostrozaUnassisted · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–3
  7. P3 18:02CHIJonathan ToewsPPGWGAssists: Patrick Kane, Brent Seabrook · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:57CHIPatrick KaneENAssists: Brandon Saad, Jonathan Toews · Wrist, 0.70 xG5–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P2 0:14LAKDrew Doughty: Interference2 min
  2. P2 7:57CHIAlex DeBrincat: Interference2 min
  3. P2 18:50CHIJonathan Toews: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 4:54LAKJake Muzzin: Holding2 min
  5. P3 8:32LAKDrew Doughty: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 8:32LAKDrew Doughty: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P3 17:25LAKTanner Pearson: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Kopitar
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHILAK
25Shots on goal32
4.3Expected goals2.9
60Shot attempts54
29Faceoffs won32
5Power plays2
4Penalty minutes10
7Hits34
10Blocked shots19
7Giveaways15
1Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestToews – Kane – Saad14:22

    xG 0.76–0.56 (58%)attempts 16–14goals 0–1

  2. Sharp – Highmore – Kampf10:29

    xG 0.20–0.18 (53%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  3. Anisimov – Jurco – Duclair8:52

    xG 0.11–0.22 (34%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  4. Hinostroza – Schmaltz – DeBrincat9:05

    xG 0.26–0.50 (34%)attempts 10–9goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeabrook – Gustafsson13:27

    xG 0.27–0.17 (61%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  2. Dahlstrom – Oesterle12:18

    xG 0.47–0.41 (54%)attempts 14–12goals 2–0

  3. Seabrook – Dahlstrom2:19

    xG 0.04–0.02 (71%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestBrown – Kopitar – Iafallo10:59

    xG 0.81–0.52 (61%)attempts 16–12goals 2–0

  2. Mitchell – Clifford – Amadio10:23

    xG 0.11–0.09 (55%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Carter – Toffoli – Pearson9:43

    xG 0.29–0.35 (45%)attempts 4–13goals 1–1

  4. Thompson – Rieder – Kempe9:26

    xG 0.31–0.39 (44%)attempts 10–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMuzzin – Folin11:06

    xG 0.40–0.23 (63%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  2. Phaneuf – Martinez13:10

    xG 0.56–0.54 (51%)attempts 9–20goals 1–0

  3. Muzzin – Doughty2:29

    xG 0.03–0.06 (36%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 2.9 xGCHI 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #178 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.99 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 71% of the time.

LAK winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).