Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 3, 2018·Rogers Place, Edmonton

New York Rangers 3, Edmonton Oilers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 56% of the time.

EDM winsNYR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NYR1822204334
EDM06216015237

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:54NYRChris KreiderAssists: Mika Zibanejad, John Gilmour · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:43EDMConnor McDavidAssists: Matt Benning, Cam Talbot · Snap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 7:51NYRMika ZibanejadPPAssists: Pavel Buchnevich, Mats Zuccarello · Wrist, 0.24 xG2–1
  4. P2 9:07NYRPaul CareyGWGAssists: Cody McLeod, David Desharnais · Tip-in, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P2 16:48EDMRyan Nugent-HopkinsAssists: Connor McDavid, Andrej Sekera · Snap, 0.14 xG3–2
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 1:48EDMZack Kassian: Boarding2 min
  2. P2 6:00EDMCam Talbot: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  3. P3 4:33NYRNeal Pionk: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 17:33NYRMarc Staal: Cross checking2 min
  5. P3 18:42EDMMichael Cammalleri: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← NYR attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hayes won the faceoff against Strome
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYREDM
34Shots on goal37
3.4Expected goals2.9
58Shot attempts63
39Faceoffs won22
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
22Hits29
13Blocked shots17
16Giveaways18
18Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestMcLeod – Desharnais – Carey7:07

    xG 0.94–0.16 (86%)attempts 15–5goals 1–0

  2. Zuccarello – Namestnikov – Vesey11:04

    xG 0.54–0.24 (69%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  3. Kreider – Zibanejad – Buchnevich11:27

    xG 0.32–0.05 (86%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  4. Spooner – Hayes – Fast12:30

    xG 0.58–0.68 (46%)attempts 8–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Gara – DeAngelo14:28

    xG 1.03–0.48 (68%)attempts 24–12goals 1–1

  2. Skjei – Gilmour13:36

    xG 0.77–0.47 (62%)attempts 16–15goals 1–0

  3. Staal – Pionk18:34

    xG 0.37–0.96 (28%)attempts 8–24goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestLucic – Draisaitl – McDavid16:16

    xG 1.03–0.51 (67%)attempts 23–11goals 1–1

  2. Cammalleri – Nugent-Hopkins – Aberg9:39

    xG 0.24–0.11 (69%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  3. Kassian – Pakarinen – Khaira6:40

    xG 0.07–0.60 (10%)attempts 2–11goals 0–0

  4. Strome – Slepyshev – Puljujarvi11:41

    xG 0.32–1.05 (24%)attempts 12–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKlefbom – Bear9:08

    xG 0.84–0.29 (74%)attempts 14–9goals 0–1

  2. Sekera – Benning10:30

    xG 0.24–0.18 (57%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Sekera – Bear3:26

    xG 0.09–0.04 (70%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.9 xGNYR 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMNYR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it NYR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 46/100 · #685 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.46 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
NYR 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 56% of the time.

EDM winsNYR wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − NYR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).