Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 7, 2018·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Philadelphia Flyers 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 66% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT11131017528
PHI0821109228

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:35PITPhil KesselPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–0
  2. P2 2:07PHIJakub VoracekAssists: Nolan Patrick · Tip-in, 0.17 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:59PHITravis KonecnyAssists: Claude Giroux, Andrew MacDonald · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:24PITJamie OleksiakAssists: Justin Schultz, Jake Guentzel · Slap, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P2 14:25PITConor ShearyGWGAssists: Sidney Crosby, Jamie Oleksiak · Backhand, 0.09 xG3–2
  6. P2 19:20PITConor ShearyAssists: Jake Guentzel, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:19PITEvgeni MalkinENAssists: Carl Hagelin, Riley Sheahan · Wrist, 0.58 xG5–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 4:14PHIJori Lehtera: Holding2 min
  2. P1 8:28PHIRobert Hagg: Boarding2 min
  3. P1 9:39PITPhil Kessel: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 12:29PHIAndrew MacDonald: Interference2 min
  5. P1 14:01PITJustin Schultz: High sticking2 min
  6. P1 17:46PHIOskar Lindblom: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 11:29PITRiley Sheahan: Interference2 min
  8. P2 16:33PITJamie Oleksiak: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 11:03PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 0:00PITJamie Oleksiak: Head butting double minor4 min
  11. P3 0:00PHIBrandon Manning: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Malkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITPHI
28Shots on goal28
3.8Expected goals2.7
57Shot attempts55
27Faceoffs won27
4Power plays5
14Penalty minutes10
17Hits21
17Blocked shots13
5Giveaways13
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Hornqvist – Hagelin7:24

    xG 0.71–0.32 (69%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  2. Crosby – Guentzel – Sheary6:03

    xG 0.46–0.22 (68%)attempts 8–8goals 2–0

  3. Crosby – Hornqvist – Guentzel3:03

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  4. Brassard – Kessel – Simon3:05

    xG 0.03–0.21 (12%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Oleksiak11:52

    xG 0.89–0.18 (84%)attempts 14–10goals 3–0

  2. Letang – Dumoulin14:51

    xG 0.82–0.75 (52%)attempts 14–13goals 0–1

  3. Maatta – Ruhwedel12:25

    xG 0.39–0.95 (29%)attempts 10–15goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestVoracek – Lindblom – Patrick8:15

    xG 0.73–0.08 (90%)attempts 12–3goals 1–0

  2. Giroux – Couturier – Konecny9:37

    xG 0.66–0.41 (62%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  3. Lehtera – Laughton – Raffl5:45

    xG 0.27–0.07 (79%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  4. Filppula – Simmonds – Weal9:24

    xG 0.05–0.44 (11%)attempts 4–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMacDonald – Hagg13:07

    xG 0.69–0.56 (55%)attempts 12–12goals 1–2

  2. Gostisbehere – Provorov13:40

    xG 0.31–0.43 (42%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

  3. Manning – Gudas12:04

    xG 0.33–0.78 (30%)attempts 11–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.7 xGPIT 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #451 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.78 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 66% of the time.

PHI winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).