Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 13, 2018·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Colorado Avalanche 5, Minnesota Wild 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL1511037522
MIN01211507134

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 16:22COLJ.T. CompherAssists: David Warsofsky · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P2 13:56MINMikko KoivuAssists: Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 14:55COLNikita ZadorovGWGAssists: Blake Comeau · Slap, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P3 0:11COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Patrik Nemeth · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–1
  5. P3 13:26COLJ.T. CompherPPAssists: Samuel Girard, Sven Andrighetto · Wrist, 0.22 xG4–1
  6. P3 18:39COLTyson JostPPAssists: Tyson Barrie, Mikko Rantanen · Backhand, 0.34 xG5–1
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 8:09COLBlake Comeau: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 17:10COLTyson Jost: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 17:10MINJoel Eriksson Ek: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 5:39COLPatrik Nemeth: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 13:31MINNate Prosser: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 13:31COLGabriel Landeskog: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 5:15COLNikita Zadorov: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 7:22COLBlake Comeau: Interference2 min
  9. P3 9:05MINJonas Brodin: Holding2 min
  10. P3 12:02MINMarcus Foligno: Charging2 min · PPG
  11. P3 17:26MINJason Zucker: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← COL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLMIN
22Shots on goal34
2.2Expected goals2.7
49Shot attempts66
20Faceoffs won32
3Power plays4
12Penalty minutes10
14Hits19
14Blocked shots16
2Giveaways3
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. Bourque – Toninato – Kerfoot4:31

    xG 0.05–0.10 (32%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  2. Andrighetto – Compher – Jost9:13

    xG 0.15–0.25 (38%)attempts 7–10goals 1–0

  3. Landeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen12:21

    xG 0.31–0.70 (31%)attempts 15–14goals 1–0

  4. Comeau – Soderberg – Nieto9:55

    xG 0.05–0.46 (10%)attempts 6–15goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWarsofsky – Siemens5:14

    xG 0.31–0.17 (64%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

  2. Warsofsky – Zadorov2:08

    xG 0.02–0.01 (57%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Nemeth – Zadorov3:16

    xG 0.03–0.07 (32%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Zucker – Granlund8:01

    xG 0.43–0.03 (94%)attempts 13–4goals 0–0

  2. Koivu – Parise – Coyle11:23

    xG 0.53–0.25 (68%)attempts 11–13goals 0–1

  3. Cullen – Ennis – Niederreiter5:26

    xG 0.22–0.09 (71%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  4. Winnik – Foligno – Eriksson Ek3:58

    xG 0.09–0.10 (48%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon13:34

    xG 0.97–0.33 (75%)attempts 19–15goals 0–2

  2. Prosser – Seeler10:05

    xG 0.24–0.16 (60%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Brodin – Dumba13:45

    xG 0.20–0.29 (41%)attempts 14–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.7 xGCOL 2.2 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 35/100 · #819 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.18 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 60% of the time.

MIN winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).