Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 15, 2018·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Columbus Blue Jackets 5, Philadelphia Flyers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 67% of the time.

PHI winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ3811417529
PHI1929012330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:41CBJOliver BjorkstrandAssists: Seth Jones, Sonny Milano · Slap, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:52CBJBoone JennerAssists: Jack Johnson, Thomas Vanek · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P1 11:34PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Travis Konecny, Andrew MacDonald · Slap, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P1 18:08CBJCam AtkinsonAssists: Zach Werenski, Artemi Panarin · Deflected, 0.12 xG3–1
  5. P2 0:14PHIShayne GostisbeherePPAssists: Ivan Provorov, Sean Couturier · Snap, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P2 3:23CBJCam AtkinsonGWGAssists: David Savard · Slap, 0.05 xG4–2
  7. P2 12:23PHIAndrew MacDonaldAssists: Travis Sanheim, Travis Konecny · Slap, 0.03 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:59CBJCam AtkinsonENAssists: Artemi Panarin, David Savard · Wrist, 0.74 xG5–3
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 18:18CBJIan Cole: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 4:16CBJArtemi Panarin: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P2 13:32CBJThomas Vanek: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 14:56PHITravis Konecny: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← CBJ attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Dubois
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJPHI
29Shots on goal30
4.3Expected goals3.2
65Shot attempts70
20Faceoffs won28
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes2
19Hits23
21Blocked shots22
1Giveaways9
5Takeaways0

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestVanek – Jenner – Wennberg10:10

    xG 0.66–0.16 (80%)attempts 11–5goals 1–0

  2. Dubinsky – Letestu – Calvert8:26

    xG 0.49–0.16 (75%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

  3. Atkinson – Panarin – Dubois15:08

    xG 0.56–0.29 (65%)attempts 18–11goals 2–0

  4. Foligno – Bjorkstrand – Milano9:39

    xG 0.26–0.65 (29%)attempts 7–13goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Nutivaara13:17

    xG 0.64–0.27 (71%)attempts 13–8goals 1–0

  2. Cole – Savard17:15

    xG 0.47–0.51 (48%)attempts 15–14goals 1–1

  3. Jones – Werenski16:25

    xG 0.84–0.89 (48%)attempts 22–25goals 2–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestVoracek – Lindblom – Patrick12:53

    xG 0.78–0.47 (62%)attempts 17–12goals 0–1

  2. Giroux – Couturier – Konecny13:04

    xG 0.42–0.35 (55%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

  3. Simmonds – Laughton – Raffl3:18

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  4. Filppula – Simmonds – Raffl4:30

    xG 0.21–0.22 (49%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestManning – Gudas15:27

    xG 0.70–0.56 (55%)attempts 20–19goals 0–1

  2. Gostisbehere – Provorov16:58

    xG 0.38–0.57 (40%)attempts 14–16goals 0–2

  3. MacDonald – Sanheim13:31

    xG 0.52–0.74 (41%)attempts 12–11goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.2 xGCBJ 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHICBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 73/100 · #372 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.68 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 67% of the time.

PHI winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).