Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 17, 2018·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Chicago Blackhawks 3, Buffalo Sabres 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 71% of the time.

BUF winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI01221719338
BUF11216314532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 18:10BUFBenoit PouliotAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Sam Reinhart · Backhand, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P2 8:15CHIJordan OesterleAssists: Patrick Kane, Jonathan Toews · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:07BUFRyan O'ReillyPPAssists: Sam Reinhart, Jack Eichel · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–2
  4. P2 14:15CHITomas JurcoAssists: Alex DeBrincat · Deflected, 0.18 xG2–2
  5. P3 0:20CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Brandon Saad, Patrick Kane · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 2:17BUFNick BaptisteAssists: Nathan Beaulieu, Victor Antipin · Tip-in, 0.12 xG3–3
  7. P3 18:04BUFNick BaptisteGWGAssists: Marco Scandella, Johan Larsson · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:21BUFSam ReinhartENAssists: Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.64 xG3–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 11:55BUFBrendan Guhle: Slashing2 min
  2. P2 6:35BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Interference2 min
  3. P2 7:00CHIVinnie Hinostroza: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 9:46CHITomas Jurco: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 5:50CHIDuncan Keith: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 16:03CHIBrent Seabrook: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIBUF
38Shots on goal32
2.8Expected goals4.1
63Shot attempts63
29Faceoffs won38
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
2Hits16
16Blocked shots11
6Giveaways11
1Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestHinostroza – Schmaltz – Highmore9:32

    xG 0.44–0.13 (77%)attempts 12–4goals 0–1

  2. Toews – Kane – Saad13:01

    xG 1.07–0.88 (55%)attempts 17–19goals 1–0

  3. Sharp – Hayden – Kampf8:17

    xG 0.47–0.59 (45%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1

  4. Anisimov – Jurco – DeBrincat10:43

    xG 0.41–0.55 (43%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Rutta15:17

    xG 1.16–0.59 (66%)attempts 19–15goals 1–0

  2. Murphy – Oesterle13:32

    xG 0.45–0.60 (43%)attempts 16–8goals 0–2

  3. Seabrook – Gustafsson14:05

    xG 0.44–1.01 (31%)attempts 13–18goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestPouliot – O'Reilly – Reinhart2:34

    xG 0.47–0.08 (85%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

  2. Pominville – Pouliot – Eichel4:43

    xG 0.24–0.05 (84%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  3. Bailey – Baptiste – Rodrigues2:54

    xG 0.13–0.01 (91%)attempts 3–1goals 1–0

  4. Pominville – Wilson – Eichel2:36

    xG 0.12–0.01 (93%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Beaulieu – Antipin13:20

    xG 0.22–0.24 (48%)attempts 8–13goals 1–0

  2. Scandella – Ristolainen15:39

    xG 1.28–1.32 (49%)attempts 22–19goals 1–2

  3. Falk – Guhle13:58

    xG 0.66–0.73 (48%)attempts 12–18goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 4.1 xGCHI 2.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 89/100 · #152 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.23 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 71% of the time.

BUF winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).