Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 17, 2018·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

San Jose Sharks 5, Vancouver Canucks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 58% of the time.

VAN winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS28111211530
VAN19212010331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:48VANNikolay GoldobinPPAssists: Derrick Pouliot, Reid Boucher · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:58SJSKevin LabancPPAssists: Joe Pavelski, Logan Couture · Wrist, 0.36 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:08SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Tomas Hertl, Mikkel Boedker · Snap, 0.18 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:47SJSBrenden DillonAssists: Dylan DeMelo, Timo Meier · Slap, 0.01 xG3–1
  5. P2 5:23VANBo HorvatPPAssists: Sam Gagner, Alexander Edler · Deflected, 0.18 xG3–2
  6. P2 11:48VANAlexander EdlerPPAssists: Sam Gagner, Daniel Sedin · Slap, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. P3 6:07SJSTimo MeierGWGAssists: Kevin Labanc, Justin Braun · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:35SJSTomas HertlENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.67 xG5–3
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 6:16VANTyler Motte: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 8:50SJSEvander Kane: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 11:06VANJake Virtanen: High sticking2 min
  4. P1 14:47VANDerrick Pouliot: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P1 18:18VANBrendan Leipsic: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 5:16SJSTimo Meier: Holding2 min · PPG
  7. P2 8:37SJSTimo Meier: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 10:21SJSPaul Martin: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sedin won the faceoff against Pavelski
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSVAN
30Shots on goal31
3.0Expected goals2.5
51Shot attempts70
36Faceoffs won36
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
17Hits40
23Blocked shots10
5Giveaways3
6Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestPavelski – Hansen – Kane10:07

    xG 0.45–0.02 (96%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  2. Tierney – Labanc – Meier9:51

    xG 0.35–0.12 (74%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

  3. Fehr – Kane – Goodrow3:42

    xG 0.16–0.17 (49%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

  4. Fehr – Goodrow – Meier2:51

    xG 0.04–0.08 (34%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDillon – DeMelo8:48

    xG 0.39–0.08 (83%)attempts 10–2goals 2–0

  2. Braun – Dillon7:41

    xG 0.31–0.16 (66%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  3. Martin – Burns7:07

    xG 0.25–0.20 (56%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestLeipsic – Horvat – Goldobin10:54

    xG 0.68–0.14 (82%)attempts 19–4goals 0–1

  2. Leipsic – Horvat – Virtanen2:08

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Dowd – Boucher – Motte2:04

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  4. Sutter – Archibald – Motte6:09

    xG 0.09–0.18 (33%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBiega – Pouliot12:04

    xG 0.45–0.15 (75%)attempts 16–6goals 0–1

  2. Edler – Biega2:08

    xG 0.00–0.14 (2%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  3. Edler – Tanev13:07

    xG 0.29–0.47 (38%)attempts 14–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.5 xGSJS 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #196 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.95 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 24% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 58% of the time.

VAN winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).