Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 22, 2018·United Center, Chicago

Vancouver Canucks 5, Chicago Blackhawks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 65% of the time.

CHI winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN21021215527
CHI113012116241

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:11VANAlexander EdlerAssists: Brendan Leipsic, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:02CHINick SchmaltzAssists: Brent Seabrook, Patrick Kane · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:42VANHenrik SedinAssists: Daniel Sedin, Sam Gagner · Wrist, 0.27 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:59VANBo HorvatGWGAssists: Nikolay Goldobin, Troy Stecher · Backhand, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P2 9:38VANAlexander EdlerAssists: Bo Horvat, Nikolay Goldobin · Slap, 0.02 xG4–1
  6. P3 3:24VANBrandon SutterAssists: Michael Del Zotto, Darren Archibald · Deflected, 0.11 xG5–1
  7. P3 16:27CHIMatthew HighmoreAssists: Brandon Saad · Tip-in, 0.11 xG5–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:49VANNikolay Goldobin: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 18:06CHIAndreas Martinsen: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 2:32CHIAndreas Martinsen: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 2:32VANDerrick Pouliot: Instigator2 min
  5. P2 2:32VANDerrick Pouliot: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 2:32VANDerrick Pouliot: Misconduct10 min
  7. P2 9:58VANTroy Stecher: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 13:52VANAlexander Edler: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sedin won the faceoff against Anisimov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCHI
27Shots on goal41
2.6Expected goals3.5
45Shot attempts69
27Faceoffs won26
1Power plays4
23Penalty minutes7
23Hits19
15Blocked shots11
6Giveaways5
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSutter – Archibald – Motte3:17

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

  2. Horvat – Virtanen – Goldobin9:29

    xG 0.45–0.59 (43%)attempts 9–14goals 2–1

  3. Dowd – Archibald – Motte5:17

    xG 0.23–0.42 (35%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  4. Jokinen – Sutter – Leipsic8:49

    xG 0.34–0.60 (36%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdler – Stecher2:25

    xG 0.13–0.02 (88%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  2. Biega – Pouliot11:07

    xG 0.65–0.56 (54%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0

  3. Del Zotto – Tanev2:27

    xG 0.13–0.11 (55%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestSaad – Hinostroza – Highmore10:16

    xG 0.92–0.21 (81%)attempts 17–7goals 1–1

  2. Sharp – Kane – Schmaltz11:23

    xG 0.70–0.35 (67%)attempts 12–9goals 1–2

  3. Hayden – Martinsen – Kampf5:50

    xG 0.21–0.02 (91%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0

  4. Anisimov – Jurco – DeBrincat7:37

    xG 0.38–0.64 (37%)attempts 6–6goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook16:09

    xG 0.96–0.47 (67%)attempts 22–6goals 1–1

  2. Murphy – Oesterle15:24

    xG 0.88–0.45 (66%)attempts 19–13goals 1–1

  3. Gustafsson – Rutta12:56

    xG 0.67–0.71 (49%)attempts 11–13goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.5 xGVAN 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 43/100 · #721 of 1271 this seasonSwing 1.03 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 65% of the time.

CHI winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).