Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 24, 2018·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Calgary Flames 1, San Jose Sharks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 55% of the time.

SJS winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY111017010138
SJS29114210533

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:52SJSBrenden DillonAssists: Chris Tierney, Timo Meier · Snap, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:06SJSJannik HansenGWGAssists: Brent Burns, Barclay Goodrow · Deflected, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P1 12:17CGYMichael StoneAssists: Micheal Ferland, Chris Stewart · Slap, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:26SJSEvander KaneSHAssists: Chris Tierney · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–3
  5. P3 10:09SJSJustin BraunAssists: Logan Couture, Melker Karlsson · Snap, 0.07 xG1–4
  6. P3 12:10SJSEvander KaneAssists: Joe Pavelski, Brenden Dillon · Deflected, 0.12 xG1–5
Penalties (15)
  1. P2 1:59SJSBrenden Dillon: Slashing2 min
  2. P2 6:14CGYRasmus Andersson: Holding2 min
  3. P2 6:59SJSKevin Labanc: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 10:17SJSBarclay Goodrow: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 17:26CGYDougie Hamilton: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 18:00CGYMikael Backlund: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 18:00SJSEvander Kane: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 18:00SJSEvander Kane: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 3:15SJSEvander Kane: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 3:15CGYTravis Hamonic: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 3:15CGYTravis Hamonic: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  12. P3 3:15SJSEvander Kane: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  13. P3 4:13CGYMark Giordano: Cross checking2 min
  14. P3 15:02SJSBrenden Dillon: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 15:02CGYGarnet Hathaway: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← CGY attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Kane
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYSJS
38Shots on goal33
3.6Expected goals3.8
73Shot attempts61
32Faceoffs won34
4Power plays3
20Penalty minutes22
40Hits14
14Blocked shots14
10Giveaways9
11Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBrouwer – Frolik – Backlund11:05

    xG 0.81–0.22 (79%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  2. Gaudreau – Lazar – Bennett10:12

    xG 0.41–0.43 (49%)attempts 14–10goals 0–1

  3. Stewart – Ferland – Jankowski9:15

    xG 0.21–0.37 (36%)attempts 10–6goals 1–1

  4. Glass – Shore – Hathaway8:04

    xG 0.36–0.78 (32%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamonic – Kulak16:52

    xG 0.99–0.84 (54%)attempts 19–14goals 0–2

  2. Stone – Kulak2:02

    xG 0.05–0.19 (20%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  3. Giordano – Hamilton15:32

    xG 0.80–0.97 (45%)attempts 17–20goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestPavelski – Kane – Meier4:03

    xG 0.93–0.03 (97%)attempts 10–2goals 1–0

  2. Tierney – Karlsson – Labanc3:53

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Couture – Boedker – Hertl8:49

    xG 0.50–0.35 (59%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  4. Tierney – Labanc – Meier5:53

    xG 0.37–0.45 (45%)attempts 7–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestDillon – DeMelo11:42

    xG 0.80–0.20 (80%)attempts 14–8goals 1–1

  2. Vlasic – Braun15:41

    xG 0.74–0.54 (58%)attempts 15–18goals 1–0

  3. Martin – DeMelo2:23

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.8 xGCGY 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 25/100 · #940 of 1271 this seasonSwing 0.80 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 55% of the time.

SJS winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).