Sat, Mar 24, 2018·Barclays Center, Brooklyn
Chicago Blackhawks 3, New York Islanders 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, New York Islanders win this game 57% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | 09 | 210 | 16 | 325 |
| NYI | 010 | 08 | 114 | 132 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 2:36CHIPatrick KanePPAssists: Patrick Sharp, Erik Gustafsson · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–0
- P2 4:25CHIBrandon SaadGWGAssists: Jordan Oesterle, Jan Rutta · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–0
- P3 17:18NYIJohn TavaresAssists: Anders Lee, Thomas Hickey · Backhand, 0.16 xG2–1
- P3 18:46CHIBrent SeabrookENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.45 xG3–1
Penalties (4)
- P1 14:51CHIArtem Anisimov: Tripping2 min
- P2 2:03NYIThomas Hickey: Tripping2 min · PPG
- P3 1:55NYIAnders Lee: Holding2 min
- P3 11:48CHIArtem Anisimov: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Barzal won the faceoff against Kane
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Chicago Blackhawks
Forward lines
- bestKane – Saad – DeBrincat12:50
xG 0.95–0.35 (73%)attempts 19–7goals 1–0
- Anisimov – Jurco – Martinsen10:05
xG 0.22–0.04 (83%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0
- Hinostroza – Schmaltz – Highmore11:51
xG 0.16–0.35 (31%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0
- Sharp – Hayden – Kampf9:07
xG 0.11–0.71 (14%)attempts 6–12goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestMurphy – Gustafsson14:45
xG 0.57–0.27 (68%)attempts 17–7goals 0–0
- Oesterle – Rutta15:38
xG 0.57–0.64 (47%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0
- Keith – Seabrook15:16
xG 0.30–0.44 (41%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0
New York Islanders
Forward lines
- bestNelson – Johnston – Fritz4:04
xG 0.33–0.01 (97%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0
- Clutterbuck – Cizikas – Johnston4:38
xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0
- Eberle – Barzal – Beauvillier14:39
xG 0.56–0.51 (52%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0
- Ladd – Clutterbuck – Cizikas3:22
xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestDavidson – Pelech15:21
xG 0.43–0.08 (84%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0
- Boychuk – Leddy15:05
xG 0.58–0.39 (60%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1
- Hickey – Pulock15:44
xG 0.56–0.80 (41%)attempts 14–19goals 1–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
NYI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYI is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, New York Islanders win this game 57% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (NYI − CHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).