Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 29, 2018·Prudential Center, Newark

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, New Jersey Devils 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 64% of the time.

NJD winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT1121811411435
NJD1121911000331

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:19NJDKyle PalmieriAssists: Nico Hischier · Snap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:44PITConor ShearyAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Jamie Oleksiak · Snap, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:59PITKris LetangAssists: Carl Hagelin, Brian Dumoulin · Slap, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P2 14:41NJDTaylor HallPPAssists: Will Butcher · Snap, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:11NJDBlake ColemanAssists: Travis Zajac · Backhand, 0.15 xG2–3
  6. P3 11:26PITPatric HornqvistAssists: Brian Dumoulin, Riley Sheahan · Tip-in, 0.03 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:19PITSidney CrosbyGWGAssists: Kris Letang · Snap, 0.36 xG4–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 14:27NJDPavel Zacha: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 17:57PITBrian Dumoulin: Interference2 min
  3. P2 1:12PITKris Letang: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 13:40PITJamie Oleksiak: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 17:49PITMatt Hunwick: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 17:49NJDMiles Wood: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 7:37NJDTravis Zajac: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 0:00PITPatric Hornqvist: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 0:00NJDJohn Moore: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NJD
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackNJD attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zajac won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITNJD
35Shots on goal31
3.5Expected goals2.5
60Shot attempts49
33Faceoffs won25
2Power plays3
13Penalty minutes11
27Hits17
10Blocked shots7
4Giveaways8
13Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestHornqvist – Sheahan – Sheary7:49

    xG 0.65–0.04 (94%)attempts 10–2goals 2–0

  2. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel14:37

    xG 0.43–0.25 (63%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  3. Kuhnhackl – Jooris – Aston-Reese3:22

    xG 0.11–0.04 (73%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  4. Hornqvist – Sheahan – Kuhnhackl2:27

    xG 0.05–0.14 (25%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLetang – Dumoulin17:44

    xG 0.93–0.32 (74%)attempts 20–12goals 2–1

  2. Schultz – Oleksiak3:27

    xG 0.19–0.11 (63%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Hunwick – Oleksiak8:17

    xG 0.28–0.46 (38%)attempts 6–8goals 1–0

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestPalmieri – Hall – Hischier12:02

    xG 0.67–0.45 (60%)attempts 12–11goals 1–0

  2. Zajac – Coleman – Noesen12:07

    xG 0.54–0.45 (55%)attempts 8–13goals 1–0

  3. Grabner – Gibbons – Zacha3:04

    xG 0.03–0.04 (42%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Zajac – Palmieri – Hall2:09

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMoore – Severson16:49

    xG 1.12–0.61 (65%)attempts 19–14goals 2–0

  2. Butcher – Mueller8:37

    xG 0.47–0.34 (58%)attempts 11–8goals 0–1

  3. Greene – Vatanen16:52

    xG 0.41–0.49 (46%)attempts 8–14goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NJD 2.5 xGPIT 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NJDPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NJD's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NJD is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 87/100 · #171 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.30 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50NJD 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 64% of the time.

NJD winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (NJD − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).